Yasaka Mark V vs Yinhe Mercury II: Which Should You Buy?
| Yasaka Mark V | Yinhe Mercury II | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.0/10 | 8.2/10 |
| best_side | both | both |
| control | 9.5 | very high |
| speed | 8.4 | medium |
| spin | 8.5 | high |
| sponge_hardness | medium (around 43 degrees ESN) | medium to medium-soft (36-38 degrees Chinese scale) |
| type | inverted | tacky inverted (budget Chinese) |
| weight_uncut_g | 47 | 60 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Both rubbers prioritise control, but they get there differently. The Mark V is an inverted control benchmark with class-leading placement, low spin sensitivity and long-lasting consistency, though it has a flat, lower-spin response and needs a faster blade to finish. The Mercury II is a tacky inverted budget Chinese rubber that grips the ball to kill slippage, delivers high spin on serves, loops and chops, and pairs very high control with an elastic, forgiving sponge that is easier than most Chinese rubbers.
Choose the Mark V if you want a proven all-round control rubber on either wing with reliable consistency and a confidence-inspiring feel, accepting its flatter trajectory and softer blocking.
Go with the Mercury II if you are a beginner or improver building a first custom racket, a control-and-spin all-rounder, or a chopper or defender who wants serious tacky Chinese spin on a tiny budget at around five dollars a sheet. It is slower than German tensors, especially at distance, rewards active strokes, and its medium throw keeps the ball low so passive shots can clip the net. Both rate closely, with the Mercury II at 8.2, so the decision comes down to whether you prefer the Mark V’s familiar feel or the Mercury’s tacky spin and rock-bottom price.
FAQ
Which has more spin?
The Mercury II. Its genuinely tacky topsheet grips the ball for high spin on serves, loops and chops, while the Mark V is below-average for spin with a flat trajectory.
Which is cheaper?
The Mercury II, dramatically so, at around five dollars a sheet. The Mark V is also pocket-friendly compared with modern tensors but costs more than the Mercury.
Are they good for choppers and defenders?
The Mercury II is well suited to choppers and defenders thanks to its tacky grip and very high control. The Mark V is a control rubber too but is geared more toward all-round play.
Which is easier for a raw beginner?
Both are forgiving, but the Mark V has class-leading control and low spin sensitivity, while the Mercury II rewards active strokes and can feel demanding for raw beginners despite its high control.