Nittaku Fastarc P-1 vs Tibhar Evolution EL-P: Which Should You Buy?
| Nittaku Fastarc P-1 | Tibhar Evolution EL-P | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 7.8/10 | 8.4/10 |
| best_side | forehand | both |
| control | 8.5 | medium-high |
| speed | 15.5 | high |
| spin | 12.25 | high |
| sponge_hardness | 47.5 degrees | 43.5 (ESN), about 35 Shore A |
| type | tensor | tensor inverted |
| weight_uncut_g | 70 | 68 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Tibhar Evolution EL-P rates 8.4 and genuinely balances speed and control by splitting the difference between harder MX-P and softer FX-P. It delivers easy spin generation with a grippy, chewy feel and superb blocking that absorbs incoming pace. The catapult provides surprising acceleration when committed, making it versatile across the full game.
Fastarc P-1 is more linear and demanding, rewarding full strokes but punishing tentative play. EL-P works well on both wings, with many users favoring it for backhand.
EL-P suits developing and intermediate all-round attackers prioritizing control, consistency, and easy spin. Fastarc P-1 is better for advanced forehand specialists. EL-P is heavier, which may matter on light blades.
FAQ
Is EL-P a good backhand choice?
Yes. Many users favor EL-P on the backhand. Fastarc P-1 is forehand-focused.
Which is easier to play?
EL-P is significantly easier with forgiving control. Fastarc P-1 demands full commitment.
Speed comparison?
Fastarc P-1 rates 15.5 speed. EL-P is slower than MX-P.
Weight differences?
EL-P is heavy for its hardness. Its weight is notable on light blades.
Best for short game?
EL-P excels at short game. Fastarc P-1 short game is tricky.