Nittaku Fastarc P-1 vs Stiga DNA Pro M: Which Should You Buy?
| Nittaku Fastarc P-1 | Stiga DNA Pro M | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 7.8/10 | 8.5/10 |
| best_side | forehand | Forehand or Backhand |
| control | 8.5 | High |
| speed | 15.5 | OFF+ |
| spin | 12.25 | Very High |
| sponge_hardness | 47.5 degrees | 47.5 degrees ESN |
| type | tensor | Inverted / Pimples-In |
| weight_uncut_g | 70 | 69 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Stiga DNA Pro M rates 8.5 versus Fastarc P-1 at 7.8. The DNA Pro M delivers an outstanding speed-spin balance on a 47.5-degree sponge with a medium-high forgiving arc. It plays grippy and responsive, making it accessible to intermediate players.
Fastarc P-1 offers a higher safety net through its high throw angle and lower spin sensitivity, but demands more technical precision. Both are comparable in sponge hardness and weight.
DNA Pro M shines for intermediate to advanced players seeking comfort and feel alongside performance. However, it is now discontinued with limited stock. Fastarc P-1 remains available, durable, and better suited to forehand specialists willing to invest in technique.
FAQ
Which is better overall?
DNA Pro M rates higher at 8.5. However, it is discontinued, making Fastarc P-1 the practical long-term choice.
Which is easier to use?
DNA Pro M has a more forgiving arc. Fastarc P-1 is more linear and demands better mechanics.
Durability comparison?
DNA Pro M durability is only 4-5 months. Fastarc P-1 is German-made and significantly more durable.
Which for backhand?
DNA Pro M suits backhand or both-sides play. Fastarc P-1 is forehand-focused.
Can I still buy DNA Pro M?
Stock is limited because it is discontinued. Fastarc P-1 is current production.