Nittaku Fastarc C-1 vs Tibhar Evolution EL-P: Which Should You Buy?
| Nittaku Fastarc C-1 | Tibhar Evolution EL-P | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 |
| best_side | backhand or allround | both |
| control | high | medium-high |
| speed | 15.25 (Nittaku scale) | high |
| spin | 12.25 (Nittaku scale) | high |
| sponge_hardness | 45 degrees | 43.5 (ESN), about 35 Shore A |
| type | inverted / tensor | tensor inverted |
| weight_uncut_g | approx 47 g (157 x 150 mm sheet) | 68 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Fastarc C-1 is a softer, more controlled 45-degree tensor excelling on opening loops and passive consistency with forgiving arc. Tibhar Evolution EL-P balances MX-P and FX-P with easy spin generation, grippy chewy feel, excellent control, superb blocking and surprising pace on acceleration—versatile across short game, looping, flat hitting and blocking, especially strong on backhand, yet it is heavy and slower than MX-P.
Choose C-1 if you want premium control and consistency with a softer sponge and forgiving arc. Pick EL-P if you seek all-round versatility, excellent blocking and easy spin across both wings—it is genuinely balanced and works very well on backhand, though heavier weight and slower speed may suit intermediate rather than advanced players.
FAQ
Which is softer and more forgiving?
C-1 at 45 degrees is softer than EL-P at 43.5 ESN. C-1 is more forgiving on opening loops; EL-P is versatile across all strokes.
Which is better for backhand?
EL-P is especially strong on backhand with excellent blocking and control. C-1 is noted as backhand or allround but less backhand-specialized.
Which is faster?
Both are similar. C-1 is 15.25 (Nittaku scale) speed; EL-P is slightly slower than MX-P but still delivers surprising pace on acceleration.
Which is heavier?
EL-P at 68g is notably heavier than C-1 at approx 47g—some players notice EL-P’s weight on the blade.