Nittaku Fastarc C-1 vs Stiga Mantra H: Which Should You Buy?
| Nittaku Fastarc C-1 | Stiga Mantra H | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.4/10 | 8.4/10 |
| best_side | backhand or allround | forehand |
| control | high | 8.8 |
| speed | 15.25 (Nittaku scale) | 9.4 |
| spin | 12.25 (Nittaku scale) | 9.1 |
| sponge_hardness | 45 degrees | hard (approx. 47.5 degrees) |
| type | inverted / tensor | inverted |
| weight_uncut_g | approx 47 g (157 x 150 mm sheet) | 65 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Nittaku Fastarc C-1 offers outstanding spin, dwell time, and a forgiving high arc with grippy G-1 topsheet. It suits intermediate to advanced loopers prioritizing arc safety and consistent spin on both wings. C-1’s medium-hard sponge (45 degrees) provides accessible performance.
Stiga Mantra H is a hard-sponge (approximately 47.5 degrees) speed tensor with low throw angle and exceptional blocking stability. It rewards sharp, aggressive forehand loops but demands precise technique and sufficient swing speed. Mantra H’s catapult effect and hard topsheet reduce dwell, making it less forgiving than C-1. Choose C-1 for spin variety; Mantra H for low-arc attacking specialists.
FAQ
Which is better for beginners?
Neither. C-1 is more accessible for intermediate players. Mantra H is too hard and demands aggressive technique unsuitable for learning.
Which suits the backhand?
C-1 works well on the backhand. Mantra H is too hard for most players’ backhand and is forehand-specific.
How different are the throw angles?
C-1 has a high arc (forgiving for opening loops). Mantra H has a low throw angle (sharp, threatening attacking trajectories). These suit opposite playing styles.
Which lasts longer?
C-1’s topsheet is durable over time. Mantra H has limited durability (roughly 3 months under regular training) and is discontinued.
Can I pair these with fast carbon blades?
C-1 pairs well with various blades. Mantra H works best with all-around or moderate off-blades, not the fastest carbon composites.