Loki RXTON 1 vs Yinhe Mercury II: Which Should You Buy?

UltraSpin comparison · 2026-06-07 · rubber

Loki RXTON 1Yinhe Mercury II
Our rating8.0/108.2/10
best_sidebothboth
controlvery highvery high
speedlow to mediummedium
spinhighhigh
sponge_hardnessmedium (around 38-39 degrees Chinese scale, roughly 50-52 ESN)medium to medium-soft (36-38 degrees Chinese scale)
typetacky inverted (budget)tacky inverted (budget Chinese)
weight_uncut_g6460

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.

This is the closest match in the group — two cheap, very high control tacky sheets aimed at beginners and control players on both wings. The Mercury II is the more genuinely tacky of the two, with a topsheet that kills slippage and good spin on serves, loops and chops, plus Soft and Medium sponge options to tune each wing. The RXTON 1 leans on a slightly higher-quality top sheet and sponge than most budget rivals, with mild tackiness and an easy, light feel.

Neither is fast. Both are slower than German tensors and reward active strokes; the Mercury II’s medium throw keeps the ball low, so passive shots can clip the net, while the RXTON 1 stays forgiving but modest in pace.

For the tightest budget or for choppers and defenders who want real tack, the Mercury II is remarkable value at around five dollars. The RXTON 1 is the pick if you prefer a slightly more refined, lighter sheet and value its consistency for a first custom racket or a frequently swapped training rubber.

FAQ

Which is the cheaper rubber?

The Mercury II, at around five dollars a sheet versus roughly fifteen for the RXTON 1. Both are firmly budget options.

Which is tackier?

The Mercury II has a genuinely tacky topsheet that grips the ball and kills slippage, while the RXTON 1’s tackiness is milder and fades over time.

Are these good for choppers or defenders?

The Mercury II is, thanks to its tack and very high control on chops. The RXTON 1 is more of a general control and training sheet for both wings.