Loki RXTON 1 vs Nittaku Fastarc S-1: Which Should You Buy?
| Loki RXTON 1 | Nittaku Fastarc S-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.0/10 | 7.9/10 |
| best_side | both | forehand or backhand |
| control | very high | 70 |
| speed | low to medium | 97 |
| spin | high | 96 |
| sponge_hardness | medium (around 38-39 degrees Chinese scale, roughly 50-52 ESN) | 35 degrees |
| type | tacky inverted (budget) | inverted |
| weight_uncut_g | 64 | around 41-43g |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Loki RXTON 1 delivers outstanding value at roughly fifteen dollars per sheet with very high control and usable spin, ideal for beginners and returning players building inexpensive custom rackets. Higher-quality topsheet and sponge than most budget Chinese rivals with light, easy handling and monthly replacement flexibility suit control-oriented club players and coaches kitting out juniors on budget. Low outright speed, mild tackiness wear, and limited competitive appeal keep RXTON in beginner training category.
Nittaku Fastarc S-1 delivers genuine tensor speed in dramatically lightweight package—typically under 43 grams uncut—making it accessible for intermediate players transitioning from beginner rubbers. Grippy non-tacky topsheet and medium-high throw angle aid loop clearance and blocking, with excellent serve-return stability reducing adjustment period. Spin output noticeably lower than Fastarc G-1, limiting appeal for spin-dependent players. RXTON prioritizes beginner-friendly control and extreme value; Fastarc S-1 prioritizes intermediate progression and lightweight accessibility.
FAQ
Which is better for beginners?
RXTON ideal for complete beginners with high control and low cost.
Which is lighter?
Fastarc S-1 at under 43 grams lighter. RXTON at 64 grams comparable.
Which allows progression?
Fastarc S-1 designed for intermediate progression. RXTON ceiling is beginner level.
How much cheaper is RXTON?
RXTON at fifteen dollars dramatically cheaper than Fastarc S-1 tensor pricing.