Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC vs Xiom Stradivarius: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC | Xiom Stradivarius | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.8/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | crisp and firm with controlled dwell | Crisp and solid with low residual vibration; direct ball contact feel with a large sweet spot |
| handle | FL / ST / AN | Flared (FL), Straight (ST) |
| head_size_mm | 158 x 152 | — |
| plies | 5 wood plies with 2 inner ALC (Arylate Carbon) layers, 7-ply total construction | 5 wood + 2 arylate carbon (Aramid Carbon) |
| reaction | 117 | — |
| speed | OFF+ | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 6.2 | 5.7 |
| vibration | 105 | — |
| weight_g | 91 | ~85-87 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Choose Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC if: You value high performance and prioritize aggressive offensive play. Rating: 8.8/10.
Choose Xiom Stradivarius if: You need forgiving control across versatile playstyles. Rating: 8.4/10.
Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC scores higher (8.8 vs. 8.4), indicating superior overall performance for its intended playstyle.
FAQ
Which is easier for learning to loop?
Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC offers more help due to sponge characteristics.
Which offers the best value?
Xiom Stradivarius delivers better value. Xiom Stradivarius combines affordability with strong performance.
Which rubber maintains its grip longer?
Both have different longevity patterns handles wear better. Check specific playing conditions in detailed reviews.