Butterfly Innerforce ZLC vs Tibhar Samsonov Force Pro Black Edition: Which Should You Buy?

UltraSpin comparison · 2026-06-12 · blade

Butterfly Innerforce ZLCTibhar Samsonov Force Pro Black Edition
Our rating8.5/108.2/10
feelSoft-medium; woody feel with ZLC carbon layers near the coremild hard, uniform vibration, linear rebound
handleAN / FL / STFL / ST
plies5 wood + 2 ZLC carbon (inner ZLC construction)7-ply all wood (limba-ayous-ayous-ayous-ayous-ayous-limba)
speedOFFOFF-
thickness_mm5.76.6-6.7mm
weight_g8483-90g (avg ~87g)

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.

The Innerforce ZLC offers rare woody carbon feel, high dwell, and spin-first balance for advanced loopers. The Tibhar Samsonov Force Pro Black Edition is a 7-ply all-wood value champion: linear, predictable rebound, forgiving on off-center contact, and genuinely versatile across loops, hits, and blocks.

Choose the ZLC if you’re advanced, want discontinued-market rarity, and build your game around heavy topspin from close to mid-distance. Pick Force Pro if you’re intermediate to advanced, seek allround control with good forgiveness, value linearity and consistency, and don’t need carbon pace. The ZLC is specialist; Force Pro is flexible.

FAQ

Which is better for blocking and hitting?

Force Pro: its linear, predictable rebound suits blocks and flat hits equally. ZLC, topspin-optimized, can feel sluggish on defensive strokes.

How heavy is Force Pro versus ZLC?

Force Pro averages 87g, slightly heavier than ZLC at 84g. This head-heavy balance requires arm conditioning but builds power.

Which dwell time is better?

ZLC’s dwell is exceptional and reward-rich. Force Pro’s dwell is decent but sacrifices some spin generation versus softer blades.

What about value?

Force Pro is excellent value: widely available, fairly priced, versatile. ZLC is discontinued premium. If budget is concern, Force Pro wins.