Butterfly Dignics 64 vs Tibhar Evolution MX-S: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Dignics 64 | Tibhar Evolution MX-S | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.8/10 | 8.4/10 |
| best_side | backhand | Forehand |
| control | 8.5 | High |
| speed | 9.5 | OFF |
| spin | 8.5 | Very High (11.5 on Tibhar scale, highest in Evolution range) |
| sponge_hardness | 40 degrees (Shore A) / 50 degrees (EUR) | around 47.3 degrees (hard) |
| type | inverted | Inverted tensor (ESN) |
| weight_uncut_g | 47 | 76 g (2.1-2.2 mm uncut sheet) |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Dignics 64 is the speed-first choice for backhand blocking and flat driving. Its spin insensitivity makes handling heavy serves and pushes straightforward; the low, flat trajectory suits fast backhand drives and aggressive blocks. Light weight (around 45g cut) and superior durability complete the package.
Evolution MX-S is the spin maximizer: highest spin output in the Evolution range with exceptional blocking and outstanding short game. It demands strong technique and does not reward passive or imprecise strokes. The sponge requires you to generate your own speed rather than relying on built-in catapult.
Choose Dignics 64 for speed, consistency, and spin insensitivity on a versatile backhand setup. Pick MX-S if you are an advanced to professional offensive player who bases your game on high-spin looping and can commit full power to every stroke. MX-S suits players who prefer technique-driven speed over rubber-assisted catapult.
FAQ
Which has more spin?
MX-S wins decisively with 9.5 out of 10 on Revspin—the highest in the Evolution range. Dignics 64 rates 8.5 and prioritizes spin insensitivity over absolute spin output.
Which is faster?
Dignics 64 rates 9.5 for speed with a snappy feel. MX-S rates OFF and relies on player technique to generate pace rather than built-in rubber catapult.
How much heavier is MX-S?
MX-S at 76g uncut is significantly heavier than Dignics 64’s 47g. This 29-gram difference can cause arm fatigue, especially on carbon blades.
Which suits blockers?
Dignics 64 is the clear winner for blocking due to spin insensitivity and fast response. MX-S excels at blocking too but demands active arm engagement and precise angles.
Who is each for?
Dignics 64: advanced backhand attackers using blocks and flat drives. MX-S: professional offensive players generating speed through technique, wanting maximum spin on forehand looping.