Friendship 729 Battle II vs Xiom Vega Asia: Which Should You Buy?
| Friendship 729 Battle II | Xiom Vega Asia | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.5/10 | 7.8/10 |
| best_side | FH | forehand or backhand |
| control | 8 | 73 |
| speed | 8 | 90 |
| spin | 9 | 88 |
| sponge_hardness | hard | 47.5 degrees |
| type | tacky | inverted tensor (ESN) |
| weight_uncut_g | 68 | 68 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Battle II excels at topspin loops and serves via mechanical spin, dwell, and consistency close to the table. Xiom Vega Asia is a durable ESN tensor favoring direct drives, smashes, and active blocks—lower throw angle suits Asian-style direct attack. Both are budget-priced; Battle II suits spin-focused Chinese-style loopers, while Vega Asia suits intermediate attackers preferring pace over spin and all-around defensive reliability.
Battle II maximizes topspin finesse; Vega Asia maximizes offensive pace and durability. Choose Battle II for spin mastery, Vega Asia for direct attack and durability on tight budgets.
FAQ
Spin comparison?
Battle II much higher spin generation. Vega Asia spin requires refined looping technique; it excels at driving, not looping.
Speed and pace?
Vega Asia much faster for flat drives and smashes. Battle II is slow on flat hits far from table.
Durability?
Vega Asia noticeably more durable than softer rubbers. Battle II tackiness fades after two months; Vega Asia topsheet can chip after one to two months.
Best for both forehand and backhand?
Vega Asia: yes. Battle II: forehand only.
Throw angle?
Both have lower throw angles. Vega Asia slightly lower, suiting direct attack.