Friendship 729 Battle II vs Stiga Mantra M: Which Should You Buy?
| Friendship 729 Battle II | Stiga Mantra M | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.5/10 | 8.2/10 |
| best_side | FH | Backhand or Forehand |
| control | 8 | High |
| speed | 8 | High |
| spin | 9 | High |
| sponge_hardness | hard | Medium (approx 45 degrees) |
| type | tacky | Inverted / Pimples-in |
| weight_uncut_g | 68 | approx 64 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Battle II is a hard tacky optimized for Chinese-style looping and serve-receive spin at minimal cost. Mantra M is a medium-hardness tensor with excellent spin, high arc, and forgiving control. Battle II suits budget-conscious improving players and those learning Chinese technique. Mantra M targets intermediates who want tensor feel and balanced performance without premium pricing. Choose Battle II to practice Chinese looping or to experiment cheaply; pick Mantra M for a budget-friendly Tenergy alternative with stable blocking and good short-game feel.
FAQ
Which is better value?
Battle II costs less but offers shorter durability. Mantra M is more expensive but maintains performance longer.
Which has a higher arc?
Mantra M delivers dramatic arc on topspin loops, making it safer. Battle II’s low diving arc suits close-table play.
Which wears out faster?
Battle II’s topsheet fades within two months. Mantra M’s topsheet wears relatively quickly but holds longer overall.
Who should use Battle II vs. Mantra M?
Battle II: budget improvers learning Chinese attack. Mantra M: intermediate attackers wanting balanced tensor performance at reasonable cost.