Friendship 729 Battle II vs Nittaku Fastarc C-1: Which Should You Buy?
| Friendship 729 Battle II | Nittaku Fastarc C-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.5/10 | 8.4/10 |
| best_side | FH | backhand or allround |
| control | 8 | high |
| speed | 8 | 15.25 (Nittaku scale) |
| spin | 9 | 12.25 (Nittaku scale) |
| sponge_hardness | hard | 45 degrees |
| type | tacky | inverted / tensor |
| weight_uncut_g | 68 | approx 47 g (157 x 150 mm sheet) |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Battle II is a hard tacky targeting spin and close-table dominance; Fastarc C-1 is a soft, grippy tensor with high arc and safety margins. Battle II demands committed strokes and suits aggressive forehand attackers; Fastarc C-1 forgives errors and excels at loops from distance. Choose Battle II to learn Chinese-style spin and serve-receive trickery quickly. Pick Fastarc C-1 if you loop heavily, want premium tensor feel at lower cost, and prefer intermediate-friendly forgiveness on the forehand or a balanced allround game.
FAQ
Which is more forgiving?
Fastarc C-1 has higher arc and dwell time, giving larger error margins. Battle II demands clean technique.
Which generates more spin?
Battle II edges out in pure spin ceiling. Fastarc C-1 offers excellent spin but requires active strokes.
Which suits backhand play?
Fastarc C-1 is explicitly designed for backhand or allround use. Battle II is optimized for forehand attack.
How do they age?
Battle II loses tackiness noticeably within two months. Fastarc C-1’s topsheet grip holds up well over time.