Friendship 729 Battle II vs Donic Bluefire M2: Which Should You Buy?
| Friendship 729 Battle II | Donic Bluefire M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.5/10 | 8.4/10 |
| best_side | FH | both |
| control | 8 | medium-high |
| speed | 8 | high |
| spin | 9 | high |
| sponge_hardness | hard | around 42.5 to 45 degrees (medium) |
| type | tacky | tensor inverted |
| weight_uncut_g | 68 | 68 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
These rubbers split along the tacky-versus-tensor line. The Battle II is a hard, tacky Chinese sheet with a low diving arc and long dwell that loads serves and brush loops from a small wrist motion, with linear no-catapult control, best on a forehand close to the table. The Bluefire M2 is a medium-hard German tensor around 42.5 to 45 degrees with excellent backhand performance, a very grippy high-arc topsheet that opens up backspin easily and a strong catapult that responds well to boosting.
On style and speed, the M2 is the springier, backhand-friendly two-wing rubber, fast with surprisingly good control for a lively tensor, especially in 2.0 mm, though it is bouncy on slow touches so short pushes and passive blocks can go long, and its sponge is fragile when reglued. The Battle II spins through tackiness with a low arc and more linear control, but it asks for committed strokes and is weaker far from the table.
Choose the Bluefire M2 if you are an intermediate-to-advanced player who wants a spinny, fast, backhand-friendly tensor with a high arc at a sensible price and plays close-to-mid distance. Choose the Battle II, the higher rated of the two, if you want heavier tacky serve and loop spin and a forehand-led close-table game, with stronger short pushes and dead serves than the springy M2 allows.
FAQ
Which is better for the backhand?
The Bluefire M2 is the backhand choice, with excellent flicks, loops, blocks and sidespin and a grippy high arc. The Battle II is forehand-dominant.
Which has a better short game?
The Battle II has the stronger short game, with a low arc and long dwell for consistent pushes. The M2 is bouncy on slow touches, so short pushes and passive blocks can go long.
Which is faster?
The M2 has a strong catapult and high speed that respond well to boosting. The Battle II is surprisingly fast for a tacky rubber but is more linear and best close to the table.
Which is the better value?
Both are value picks. The M2 is a lower-cost alternative to premium Japanese rubbers, and the Battle II often sells three to four sheets for the price of one premium tensor.