Xiom Stradivarius vs Yasaka Ma Lin Soft Carbon: Which Should You Buy?
| Xiom Stradivarius | Yasaka Ma Lin Soft Carbon | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.4/10 | 8.1/10 |
| feel | Crisp and solid with low residual vibration; direct ball contact feel with a large sweet spot | medium-soft and flexible for a carbon blade, with clear feedback and a large sweet spot |
| handle | Flared (FL), Straight (ST) | FL/ST/AN |
| plies | 5 wood + 2 arylate carbon (Aramid Carbon) | 7-ply (5 wood plus 2 very thin carbon layers) — same outer veneer as the Yasaka Extra |
| speed | OFF | OFF- |
| thickness_mm | 5.7 | 5.8 |
| weight_g | ~85-87 | 87 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Stradivarius is a premium, crisp Aramid carbon blade with explosive topspin feel; Soft Carbon is a medium-soft, flexible carbon with excellent short game and clear feedback. Stradivarius is stiffer and faster; Soft Carbon is forgiving and more controllable.
Soft Carbon excels at blocking and short play with unusual clarity for carbon; Stradivarius dominates topspin looping at mid-distance. Soft Carbon has large sweet spot and fewer off-center vibrations; Stradivarius feels sharper. Soft Carbon suits improvers moving from premade bats; Stradivarius suits intermediate to advanced topspin players. Both have good cost-benefit, but Stradivarius is premium-priced.
FAQ
Which is better for beginners moving up?
Yasaka Ma Lin Soft Carbon with softer, forgiving feel and excellent short game.
Which is better for topspin looping?
Stradivarius with stiffer, crisper carbon feel.
Who should pick Soft Carbon?
Improving and control-oriented offensive players wanting soft, forgiving carbon.