Stiga Mantra M vs Tibhar Evolution FX-P: Which Should You Buy?
| Stiga Mantra M | Tibhar Evolution FX-P | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.2/10 | 8.4/10 |
| best_side | Backhand or Forehand | Backhand or allround forehand |
| control | High | 68 |
| speed | High | 94 |
| spin | High | 98 |
| sponge_hardness | Medium (approx 45 degrees) | approx 40 degrees (softest in Evolution line) |
| type | Inverted / Pimples-in | Inverted / tensor |
| weight_uncut_g | approx 64 | 68 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Both are excellent intermediate choices with strong control, but they prioritize differently. The Stiga Mantra M excels at loops and backhand play with a grippy sheet, while the Tibhar Evolution FX-P offers more spin output and forgiveness on mishits, especially suited to slower blades. Mantra M wears topsheet faster; FX-P caps speed at distance. Pick Stiga if you want stable mid-table blocking and value durability; pick Tibhar if you want forgiving all-court spin and consistent play on both wings.
FAQ
Which is better for backhand?
Both work well on backhand. Mantra M has a grippy topsheet that handles backspin lifts cleanly; FX-P’s softer sponge and high spin make it slightly more forgiving for loopers and defenders.
Do these rubbers lose spin over time?
Yes. Mantra M’s topsheet wears quickly under regular play. FX-P reports spin loss after around six months, depending on usage.
Can I use either on fast carbon blades?
Mantra M suits mid-range speed blades better; it loses power at distance. FX-P is more flexible across blade types but lacks top speed either way.