Stiga Mantra M vs Tibhar Aurus Prime: Which Should You Buy?
| Stiga Mantra M | Tibhar Aurus Prime | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.2/10 | 8.5/10 |
| best_side | Backhand or Forehand | forehand |
| control | High | 7.5/10 |
| speed | High | 9.0/10 |
| spin | High | 9.5/10 |
| sponge_hardness | Medium (approx 45 degrees) | 50 degrees |
| type | Inverted / Pimples-in | tensor |
| weight_uncut_g | approx 64 | 70 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Stiga Mantra M balances spin generation and control with a high error margin, making it ideal for intermediate players developing topspin loops and service spin. However, the top sheet wears quickly and loses power away from the table. Tibhar Aurus Prime trades forgiveness for explosive topspin quality and durable performance, but carries a steep learning curve and requires advanced technique. Choose Mantra M for accessibility and placement; choose Aurus Prime for raw power and consistency at elite levels.
FAQ
Which is better for beginners?
Stiga Mantra M. Its softer top sheet and forgiving nature make it far more accessible than Aurus Prime’s hard sponge and catapult effect.
Which lasts longer?
Tibhar Aurus Prime holds up better after months of play; Mantra M top sheet degrades noticeably within weeks under heavy use.
Which generates more spin?
Aurus Prime edges ahead with its 9.5/10 spin rating versus Mantra M’s 8.2, plus heavier, more arcing loops.
Can I use these on backhand and forehand?
Mantra M works on both; Aurus Prime is optimized for forehand on medium-pace blades.