Stiga Carbonado 145 vs Yinhe T-11+: Which Should You Buy?
| Stiga Carbonado 145 | Yinhe T-11+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.4/10 | 7.8/10 |
| feel | stiff, direct and rather linear with a large sweet spot, but the very thin TeXtreme layers keep the vibration close to a 5-ply all-wood blade | very light, stiff but soft balsa core with a carbon ping |
| handle | FL/ST (also offered as Legend and penhold) | FL |
| plies | 5 wood plus 2 TeXtreme carbon (5+2 composite) with the carbon fibers laid at a 45 degree angle for torsional bendability | 5W+2 Carbon with balsa core (two thin wood outers, one carbon layer per side, around a thick balsa middle ply) |
| speed | OFF+ | OFF- |
| thickness_mm | 5.7 | 6.5 |
| weight_g | 85 | 78 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Both are carbon-equipped offensive blades, but they feel worlds apart. The Carbonado 145 is a stiff OFF+ 5+2 TeXtreme build with mid-distance power, a large sweet spot, strong two-wing blocking and wood-like feedback. It is demanding for inconsistent players and is now discontinued.
The Yinhe T-11+ is an exceptionally light balsa-carbon blade, one of the lightest offensive options around, with fast speed yet more control than typical carbon. Its stiffness makes hitting through spin and flat smashing easy, with strong flicking and a stable short game, and it offers outstanding value. The trade-offs are heavy topspin looping as its clear weakness, a fragile surface that must be sealed, passive blocks that can lack rebound, and a learning curve with fast rubbers.
Choose the Carbonado 145 if you want stiff carbon power, a large sweet spot and aggressive blocking. Choose the T-11+ if you are a flat hitter, pips or combination player, blocker or power-loop driver who wants serious speed in a featherlight package, paired with soft to medium rubbers.
FAQ
Which blade is lighter?
The T-11+ is far lighter at around 78 grams thanks to its balsa core, versus around 85 grams for the Carbonado 145, making the T-11+ one of the lightest offensive blades around.
Which is better for heavy topspin looping?
Neither excels here, but the T-11+ names heavy topspin looping as its clear weakness. The Carbonado 145 handles mid-distance offense more comfortably.
Does either blade need sealing before use?
The T-11+ has a fragile surface that can splinter and must be sealed before use. The Carbonado 145 does not carry the same warning.
Which suits flat hitters and blockers better?
The T-11+ is built for flat hitters, pips-out and combination players and blockers, with easy flat smashing. The Carbonado 145 is more of an all-round two-wing attacking blade.