Nittaku Fastarc P-1 vs Xiom Omega VII Pro: Which Should You Buy?
| Nittaku Fastarc P-1 | Xiom Omega VII Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 7.8/10 | 8.6/10 |
| best_side | forehand | forehand |
| control | 8.5 | medium |
| speed | 15.5 | very fast |
| spin | 12.25 | very high |
| sponge_hardness | 47.5 degrees | 47.5 degrees |
| type | tensor | tensor |
| weight_uncut_g | 70 | approx 64 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Xiom Omega VII Pro rates 8.6 and excels at outstanding counterlooping speed and spin from mid and long distance. The elastic topsheet plays softer than rated hardness, aiding feel and high throw angle keeps aggressive topspin loops safely over the net. Performance holds up across multiple months of heavy use, making it genuinely durable.
Fastarc P-1 at 7.8 is also durable but more linear and precision-focused. Both are 47.5-degree tensors, but Omega VII Pro prioritizes mid-far distance counterlooping.
Omega VII Pro suits advanced to expert offensive players relying on powerful topspin loops and counterloops from mid to long distance. It is a high-performance alternative to Butterfly Tenergy 05 at more accessible price. Short game is very difficult.
FAQ
Why is short game difficult?
Pushing and flicking are inconsistent. Mis-timed strokes tend to float long or spray wide.
Is it suitable for beginners?
No. Not suitable for beginners or intermediate players without solid technique.
Best distance range?
Excels at mid to long distance counterlooping.
Blade sensitivity?
May feel blade-sensitive on slower all-wood setups.
How does it compare to Tenergy 05?
High-performance alternative to Tenergy 05 at more accessible price.