Nittaku Fastarc P-1 vs Tibhar Evolution EL-S: Which Should You Buy?
| Nittaku Fastarc P-1 | Tibhar Evolution EL-S | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 7.8/10 | 8.5/10 |
| best_side | forehand | either |
| control | 8.5 | 86 |
| speed | 15.5 | 87 |
| spin | 12.25 | 90 |
| sponge_hardness | 47.5 degrees | medium-hard |
| type | tensor | tensor |
| weight_uncut_g | 70 | 74 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
The Nittaku Fastarc P-1 and Tibhar Evolution EL-S represent opposing approaches to tensor design. The P-1 is a specialist forehand rubber for advanced players who can execute full, technically sound topspin strokes. It generates impressive spin on power loops despite its subdued tactile feedback and delivers strong serve spin generation. However, it is very linear and demanding: tentative strokes produce weak, error-prone results, and it requires greater precision when opening against heavy backspin compared to its softer sibling the G-1. Short-game play is tricky due to bounciness and lack of tacky grip.
The Tibhar EL-S is the more forgiving option, rated at 10 out of 10 for topspin looping and 9.5 out of 10 for short game. It works on both all-rated and off-rated blades and suits intermediate attackers stepping up from non-tensor rubbers. The EL-S sponge is medium-hard versus the P-1 at 47.5 degrees, making the EL-S considerably more accessible. Both deliver similar speed around 15.5 and 87 ratings, but the P-1 demands more from the player’s technique.
Choose the P-1 if you have advanced forehand mechanics and want a high-arc tensor that rewards precision over raw catapult. Choose the EL-S for more forgiving, all-court play and superior short-game performance.
FAQ
Is the P-1 only for forehand or can I use it on backhand?
The P-1 is optimized for forehand use and is not well-suited to backhand play. Its demanding character and tricky short game make it a poor backhand choice. The EL-S, by contrast, works equally well on either wing.
Why is the P-1 considered more demanding?
The P-1 has a very linear response: tentative or arm-only strokes produce weak results, while full, committed topspin strokes unlock its impressive spin and speed. The EL-S is more forgiving of stroke variation and suits developing technique better.
Can a developing player grow into the P-1 eventually?
Yes, if they are willing to commit to mastering full topspin mechanics. However, the Fastarc C-1 or G-1 are better learning tools because they reward technique development while remaining forgiving. The P-1 is best left for players who already have advanced stroke mechanics.
How do serve spin and short game compare?
The P-1 generates strong serve spin despite subdued tactile feedback, but short game is tricky due to bounciness. The EL-S excels in short game at 9.5 out of 10 rating and also handles serves well, making it superior for players who emphasize touch shots and serve variation.