Nittaku Fastarc C-1 vs Tibhar Aurus Prime: Which Should You Buy?
| Nittaku Fastarc C-1 | Tibhar Aurus Prime | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.4/10 | 8.5/10 |
| best_side | backhand or allround | forehand |
| control | high | 7.5/10 |
| speed | 15.25 (Nittaku scale) | 9.0/10 |
| spin | 12.25 (Nittaku scale) | 9.5/10 |
| sponge_hardness | 45 degrees | 50 degrees |
| type | inverted / tensor | tensor |
| weight_uncut_g | approx 47 g (157 x 150 mm sheet) | 70 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Nittaku Fastarc C-1 delivers outstanding spin and dwell on opening loops with a forgiving high arc and grippy topsheet. Its medium-hard sponge (45 degrees) and versatile character suit intermediate to advanced loopers on either wing, prioritizing arc safety and consistency.
Tibhar Aurus Prime offers professional-grade topspin quality, heavy arcing power, and excellent flat hitting. Its softer feel and low spin sensitivity appeal to advanced players, but the strong catapult effect demands technical precision and produces unpredictable pushes. Aurus Prime is forehand-focused and not recommended for beginners or intermediate players.
FAQ
Which generates more spin?
Both excel at spin (C-1: 12.25 Nittaku, Aurus Prime: 9.5 out of 10). C-1 emphasizes spin variety; Aurus Prime emphasizes heavy topspin power.
Which is easier to learn?
C-1. Its forgiving high arc and grippy topsheet suit developing loopers. Aurus Prime has a steep learning curve unsuitable for beginners.
Can I use either on the backhand?
C-1 works well on the backhand. Aurus Prime is forehand-focused, though advanced players may use it backhand.
How do they differ in catapult effect?
C-1 has moderate catapult with high arc for safety. Aurus Prime has a strong catapult that causes unpredictable pushes and demands control.
Which pairs better with medium-pace blades?
Aurus Prime is explicitly recommended for medium-pace blades to manage the strong catapult. C-1 suits a wider variety of blade speeds.