Nittaku Acoustic vs Xiom Stradivarius: Which Should You Buy?

UltraSpin comparison · 2026-06-10 · blade

Nittaku AcousticXiom Stradivarius
Our rating8.7/108.4/10
feelCrisp all-wood feel with a large sweet spot, long dwell and a signature acoustic soundCrisp and solid with low residual vibration; direct ball contact feel with a large sweet spot
handleFL/STFlared (FL), Straight (ST)
plies5-ply all wood (Limba outer veneers over a tung and ayous core)5 wood + 2 arylate carbon (Aramid Carbon)
speedOFF-OFF
thickness_mm5.75.7
weight_g88~85-87

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.

Acoustic offers pure all-wood control with class-leading feedback, large sweet spot, and excellent looping from any distance. Crisp acoustic sound and premium craftsmanship justify the price for touch-focused players. Speed is modest (OFF-) and raw power flat hits do not match carbon performance.

Stradivarius delivers Aramid Carbon construction competing with Butterfly ALC at a fraction of ALC price. Very low residual vibration gives clean, direct ball contact. Generous sweet spot, good consistency, and excellent close-to-table topspin (OFF+) with solid mid-distance (OFF). Speed drops at longer distance and flat trajectories emerge at maximum swing speeds.

Select Acoustic for premium all-wood touch, mid-distance looping, and control-first approach regardless of cost. Choose Stradivarius if you want premium arylate-carbon performance, balanced speed and control, without Butterfly ALC pricing.

FAQ

Which is faster?

Stradivarius with arylate-carbon construction (OFF+/OFF) versus Acoustic’s modest OFF- pace.

Which costs less?

Stradivarius significantly undercuts comparable Butterfly ALC blades; Acoustic carries premium all-wood pricing.

Which has better topspin feel?

Both excel: Acoustic through long dwell, Stradivarius through low vibration and direct contact feel.

Which is better for beginners?

Acoustic is friendlier for learning control; Stradivarius suits advancing intermediate-to-advanced players.