Gewo Nexxus EL Pro 48 vs Nittaku Fastarc S-1: Which Should You Buy?

UltraSpin comparison · 2026-06-12 · rubber

Gewo Nexxus EL Pro 48Nittaku Fastarc S-1
Our rating8.7/107.9/10
best_sideForehand or backhandforehand or backhand
control9670
speed11897
spin12896
sponge_hardness48 degrees (medium-hard)35 degrees
typeInverted tensorinverted
weight_uncut_gapprox. 68-72 garound 41-43g

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.

The Gewo Nexxus EL Pro 48 is a hard, spin-dominant tensor (48 degrees) that delivers premium performance at a sub-premium price. Its main strength is outstanding spin generation, especially on loops and serves, paired with excellent dwell time and close-table control. However, it demands strong technique and an adjustment period due to its high throw angle.

The Nittaku Fastarc S-1 is a lightweight, forgiving tensor (35 degrees, under 43g uncut) designed for developing and intermediate players. It prioritizes accessibility and consistency over maximum spin, with genuine tensor speed and excellent blocking capability. Fastarc lacks the raw spin output of the Nexxus but makes up for it with user-friendliness and reliability.

Choose the Nexxus if you can handle a demanding sponge and want spin-heavy play. Pick the Fastarc if you value control, lightweight feel, and forgiveness while building technique.

FAQ

Which rubber is better for a beginner?

The Fastarc S-1 is much more accessible. Its lower hardness (35 degrees) and lighter weight make it forgiving, while the Nexxus at 48 degrees requires intermediate-plus technique.

Which generates more spin?

The Nexxus EL Pro 48 has a clear spin advantage (128 vs 96 on specs) thanks to its harder sponge and tensor design, but this requires proper engagement.

What about speed and control?

Nexxus is faster and harder to control, with a high throw angle. Fastarc offers better control with a medium-high throw angle, making it safer and more consistent.

Are they both dual-sided?

Yes, both work on forehand and backhand, though the Nexxus requires more active technique regardless of side.