Donic Appelgren Allplay vs Xiom Stradivarius: Which Should You Buy?
| Donic Appelgren Allplay | Xiom Stradivarius | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.3/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | medium, controlled | Crisp and solid with low residual vibration; direct ball contact feel with a large sweet spot |
| handle | FL/ST/AN | Flared (FL), Straight (ST) |
| plies | 5W (abachi core + limba) | 5 wood + 2 arylate carbon (Aramid Carbon) |
| speed | ALL | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 5.8 | 5.7 |
| weight_g | 85 | ~85-87 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Pick the Donic Appelgren Allplay if you are under USATT 1800 and want one blade to master every stroke with high consistency and excellent feel. It is designed for players building technique without penalty for mistakes. Choose the Xiom Stradivarius if you are an intermediate-to-advanced topspin attacker who wants arylate-carbon performance at a fraction of Butterfly ALC pricing. The Stradivarius competes at OFF+ close to the table, offers a large sweet spot and pairs well with any rubber type. The Allplay is the learning platform; the Stradivarius is the specialized offensive tool.
FAQ
Which has better spin performance?
The Xiom Stradivarius with its excellent topspin and looping performance thanks to Aramid Carbon construction.
Which is better for beginners?
The Donic Appelgren Allplay with its high forgiveness and outstanding feedback on every stroke.
Why is the Stradivarius more affordable than Butterfly ALC?
Xiom uses arylate carbon instead of premium materials, delivering comparable offensive play at a lower price.