Butterfly Timo Boll Allround vs Xiom Stradivarius: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Timo Boll Allround | Xiom Stradivarius | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.3/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | Medium-soft, classic all-wood dwell with good tactile feedback | Crisp and solid with low residual vibration; direct ball contact feel with a large sweet spot |
| handle | FL/ST/AN/XXS | Flared (FL), Straight (ST) |
| plies | 5-ply all wood (koto outer) | 5 wood + 2 arylate carbon (Aramid Carbon) |
| speed | ALL+ | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 5.5 | 5.7 |
| weight_g | ~85 | ~85-87 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
The Timo Boll Allround (8.3) remains a pure all-wood teaching tool with medium-soft dwell and tactile feedback supporting technique development at close-to-mid-table range. The Xiom Stradivarius (8.4) introduces arylate carbon construction to a more affordable price point, delivering OFF-class speed and excellent topspin performance while competing with Butterfly ALC blades at a fraction of their cost.
Xiom’s Stradivarius offers very low residual vibration for clean, direct ball contact and pairs well with a wide range of rubber types. Its generous sweet spot and OFF+ performance close to the table make it immediately competitive for intermediate offensive players. Timo Boll’s koto outer veneer adds crispness without sacrificing safety; Stradivarius’s stiff carbon feel may not suit players preferring softer, more flexible feedback. The critical distinction is material: Timo Boll’s all-wood build keeps it lightweight and beginner-friendly, while Stradivarius’s carbon composition sacrifices some forgiveness for speed and offensive potential.
Select Timo Boll if you are still building fundamentals and want to avoid being overwhelmed by speed. Select Stradivarius if you have mastered basic technique and want to transition into a topspin-dominant game with premium performance at mid-tier pricing.
FAQ
Which is better for topspin looping?
Xiom Stradivarius excels at topspin and looping thanks to its Aramid Carbon construction. Timo Boll lacks the speed and dwell for heavy looping.
Which is more forgiving?
Timo Boll’s all-wood build and medium-soft feel are more forgiving. Stradivarius’s stiff carbon feel may not suit players who prefer softer feedback.
Which handles speed better at distance?
Timo Boll maintains consistency at mid-distance. Stradivarius’s speed drops off noticeably at longer distances, favoring close-to-table play.
Which offers better value for the performance?
Stradivarius competes with Butterfly ALC blades at a fraction of their price. Timo Boll, discontinued, incurs secondary-market sourcing costs.