Butterfly Tenergy 80 vs Yasaka Mark V: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Tenergy 80 | Yasaka Mark V | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.8/10 | 8.0/10 |
| best_side | both | both |
| control | medium-high | 9.5 |
| speed | 13.5/14 | 8.4 |
| spin | 11.2/12 | 8.5 |
| sponge_hardness | 36° | medium (around 43 degrees ESN) |
| type | tensor inverted (Spring Sponge) | inverted |
| weight_uncut_g | 67 | 47 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Tenergy 80 is a faster, more direct Tenergy with a perfect topspin arc, a medium-low throw for forgiving blocking and outstanding versatility across loops, hits and serves at mid-distance. Yasaka Mark V is a long-running control classic with class-leading placement, low spin sensitivity and excellent consistency over a very long lifespan, but it trails modern tensors on raw speed and bite.
On style, both are forgiving with lower spin sensitivity, but the 80 brings real top-end speed, offensive versatility and elite blocking, while the Mark V has a flatter trajectory, weaker passive blocking and needs a faster blade to finish points. The 80 suits upper-intermediate and advanced attackers; the Mark V is the value-focused technique-builder.
Pick Tenergy 80, rated 8.8, if you want a fast, direct, forgiving rubber with elite blocking and strong mid-distance attack. Pick the Mark V if you are a beginner or value-minded allrounder who prizes feel, consistency and a long lifespan, noting it was designed for celluloid and plays worse with modern plastic balls.
FAQ
Which is faster?
Tenergy 80 is much faster and more direct, while the Mark V has lower outright speed and needs a faster blade to finish points.
Which is more forgiving?
Both are forgiving. Tenergy 80 has lower spin sensitivity and excellent blocking, and the Mark V has class-leading control and low spin sensitivity.
Which lasts longer?
The Mark V has excellent consistency and a very long lifespan, while no durability limit is noted for Tenergy 80.
Does ball type matter?
Yes for the Mark V, which was designed for celluloid balls and performs noticeably worse with modern plastic balls.