Butterfly Sriver FX vs Yasaka Mark V: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Sriver FX | Yasaka Mark V | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 7.8/10 | 8.0/10 |
| best_side | both | both |
| control | high | 9.5 |
| speed | medium | 8.4 |
| spin | medium-high | 8.5 |
| sponge_hardness | soft | medium (around 43 degrees ESN) |
| type | high-tension inverted (soft) | inverted |
| weight_uncut_g | 62 | 47 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
These are two classic, control-first rubbers that beginners and value players gravitate toward, so the decision is feel and detail. The Sriver FX is a soft, high-tension classic with outstanding control and consistency, excellent for blocking and chopping and beloved by developing players, though it was designed for speed glue and feels slow and tame unglued. The Mark V is a classic inverted rubber around 43 degrees with control and ball placement rated near a perfect 10 by several reviewers, excellent consistency and a very long lifespan.
The two play closely but differ in feel and trajectory. The Sriver FX has a soft, forgiving sponge and a slightly tacky, touch-friendly topsheet, but it lacks the catapult, speed and high throw of modern tensors and struggles for power on big strokes. The Mark V is forgiving with low spin sensitivity and class-leading consistency, but it has below-average spin with a flat trajectory, weak passive blocking, and it performs noticeably worse with modern plastic balls since it was designed for celluloid. The Mark V is also much lighter at 47 grams uncut against the Sriver FX’s 62.
Go with the Sriver FX if you want a soft, forgiving, high-control rubber for blocking, chopping and steady all-round play and value a durable classic at a low price. Go with the Mark V if you want maximum control while building technique, prize feel, consistency and a long-lasting forgiving rubber, and accept lower speed and spin. The Mark V rates 8.0 to the Sriver FX’s 7.8.
FAQ
Which rubber is more forgiving?
Both are very forgiving. The Sriver FX has outstanding control and consistency with a soft sponge, and the Mark V has class-leading control and low spin sensitivity that makes returns against varied spin easy.
Which lasts longer?
The Mark V has excellent consistency, sheet-to-sheet uniformity and a very long lifespan. The Sriver FX is a durable classic too, offering good value at roughly 30 to 40 US dollars.
Which is better with the modern plastic ball?
Neither is optimized for it. The Mark V was designed for celluloid balls and performs noticeably worse with modern plastic balls, while the Sriver FX is a decades-old design also not optimized for the modern ball.
Which is lighter?
The Mark V is much lighter at 47 grams uncut versus the Sriver FX’s 62 grams uncut, which can suit players wanting a lighter setup.