Butterfly Primorac vs Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Primorac | Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.3/10 | 8.2/10 |
| feel | medium, classic all-wood, long dwell and high control | Medium |
| handle | FL/ST | FL|ST |
| plies | 5W (all wood) — Limba/Limba/Ayous/Limba/Limba | 5 wood + 2 carbon (inner FE carbon) |
| speed | OFF- | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 6 | 5.5 |
| weight_g | 85 | 90 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Butterfly Primorac and Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner offer distinct approaches to offensive blade construction. Butterfly Primorac emphasizes superior control and dwell with its construction, while Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner provides solid all-around performance through its carbon construction. Pick Butterfly Primorac for close-to-table spin-focused play; pick Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner for faster attack and mid-distance aggression.
FAQ
How do Butterfly Primorac and Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner differ in speed?
Butterfly Primorac offers OFF- speed while Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner delivers OFF. This affects how much pace you generate and how suitable each is for your playing distance and style.
Which rubber or blade has better control?
Control varies by construction. Excellent control and a long, satisfying dwell that rewards spin and placement with Butterfly Primorac, while Outstanding control and spin performance validated across dozens of reviews with Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner.
What is the weight difference between these options?
Butterfly Primorac weighs 85 while Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner weighs 90. Lighter options reduce fatigue on long rallies; heavier options provide more stability.
Which blade suits all-wood fundamentals better?
Butterfly Primorac maintains stronger all-wood characteristics, ideal for players valuing traditional feel. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner adds carbon for enhanced stability and power.