Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC vs Stiga Cybershape Carbon: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC | Stiga Cybershape Carbon | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.8/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | crisp and firm with controlled dwell | Medium-stiff with woody feedback; head-heavy balance; larger sweet spot placed further up the blade |
| handle | FL / ST / AN | Flared (Classic) or Concave (Master) |
| head_size_mm | 158 x 152 | — |
| plies | 5 wood plies with 2 inner ALC (Arylate Carbon) layers, 7-ply total construction | 5+2 carbon (CCF Close Core Fibre — carbon layer sits directly on wood core) |
| reaction | 117 | — |
| speed | OFF+ | OFF (Stiga speed rating 9.0 out of 10) |
| thickness_mm | 6.2 | approx 5 mm |
| vibration | 105 | — |
| weight_g | 91 | 85 plus or minus 5 g |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Choose Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC if: You value high performance and prioritize aggressive offensive play. Rating: 8.8/10.
Choose Stiga Cybershape Carbon if: You need balanced performance across versatile playstyles. Rating: 8.4/10.
Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC scores higher (8.8 vs. 8.4), indicating superior overall performance for its intended playstyle.
FAQ
Which is easier for learning to loop?
Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC offers more help due to sponge characteristics.
Which offers the best value?
Stiga Cybershape Carbon delivers better value. Stiga Cybershape Carbon combines affordability with strong performance.
Which rubber maintains its grip longer?
Both have different longevity patterns handles wear better. Check specific playing conditions in detailed reviews.