Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC vs Stiga Clipper Wood: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC | Stiga Clipper Wood | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.8/10 | 8.4/10 |
| feel | crisp and firm with controlled dwell | solid, medium-stiff, hard fast all-wood with a big sweetspot |
| handle | FL / ST / AN | FL/ST/AN/PEN |
| head_size_mm | 158 x 152 | — |
| plies | 5 wood plies with 2 inner ALC (Arylate Carbon) layers, 7-ply total construction | 7W (all wood) - limba outer plies over an ayous core, no carbon or synthetic layers |
| reaction | 117 | — |
| speed | OFF+ | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 6.2 | 6.3 |
| vibration | 105 | — |
| weight_g | 91 | 90 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Choose Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC if: You value high performance and prioritize aggressive offensive play. Rating: 8.8/10.
Choose Stiga Clipper Wood if: You need forgiving control across versatile playstyles. Rating: 8.4/10.
Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC scores higher (8.8 vs. 8.4), indicating superior overall performance for its intended playstyle.
FAQ
Which is easier for learning to loop?
Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC offers more help due to sponge characteristics.
Which offers the best value?
Stiga Clipper Wood delivers better value. Stiga Clipper Wood combines affordability with strong performance.
Which rubber maintains its grip longer?
Both have different longevity patterns handles wear better. Check specific playing conditions in detailed reviews.