Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC vs Stiga Allround Classic Carbon: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC | Stiga Allround Classic Carbon | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.8/10 | 7.8/10 |
| feel | crisp and firm with controlled dwell | Medium stiffness, wood-like touch with carbon crispness, small vibration, large sweet spot |
| handle | FL / ST / AN | FL, ST, WRB |
| head_size_mm | 158 x 152 | — |
| plies | 5 wood plies with 2 inner ALC (Arylate Carbon) layers, 7-ply total construction | 5 wood + 2 carbon |
| reaction | 117 | — |
| speed | OFF+ | ALL+ |
| thickness_mm | 6.2 | 5.6 |
| vibration | 105 | — |
| weight_g | 91 | 81 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Choose Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC if: You value high performance and prioritize aggressive offensive play. Rating: 8.8/10.
Choose Stiga Allround Classic Carbon if: You need forgiving control across versatile playstyles. Rating: 7.8/10.
Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC scores higher (8.8 vs. 7.8), indicating superior overall performance for its intended playstyle.
FAQ
Which is easier for learning to loop?
Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC offers more help due to sponge characteristics.
Which offers the best value?
Stiga Allround Classic Carbon delivers better value. Stiga Allround Classic Carbon combines affordability with strong performance.
Which rubber maintains its grip longer?
Both have different longevity patterns handles wear better. Check specific playing conditions in detailed reviews.