Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC vs Nittaku Acoustic Carbon: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC | Nittaku Acoustic Carbon | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.8/10 | 8.8/10 |
| feel | crisp and firm with controlled dwell | Medium-hard outer carbon with surprising wood-like dwell and ball retention; crisp sound on contact |
| handle | FL / ST / AN | FL, ST (also Large Handle and Chinese Penhold variants available) |
| head_size_mm | 158 x 152 | — |
| plies | 5 wood plies with 2 inner ALC (Arylate Carbon) layers, 7-ply total construction | 7 plies — 5 wood + 2 FE carbon (Limba - FE Carbon - Limba - Tung - Limba - FE Carbon - Limba) |
| reaction | 117 | — |
| speed | OFF+ | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 6.2 | 5.5mm |
| vibration | 105 | — |
| weight_g | 91 | approx 90g |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Choose Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC if: You value high performance and prioritize aggressive offensive play. Rating: 8.8/10.
Choose Nittaku Acoustic Carbon if: You need balanced performance across versatile playstyles. Rating: 8.8/10.
Both earn equal ratings. The choice depends on whether you prefer Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC’s specific strengths over Nittaku Acoustic Carbon’s design philosophy.
FAQ
Which is easier for learning to loop?
Butterfly Ovtcharov Innerforce ALC offers more help due to sponge characteristics.
Which offers the best value?
Nittaku Acoustic Carbon delivers better value. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon combines affordability with strong performance.
Which rubber maintains its grip longer?
Both have different longevity patterns handles wear better. Check specific playing conditions in detailed reviews.