Butterfly Innerforce ZLC vs Stiga Cybershape Wood: Which Should You Buy?

UltraSpin comparison · 2026-06-12 · blade

Butterfly Innerforce ZLCStiga Cybershape Wood
Our rating8.5/108.4/10
feelSoft-medium; woody feel with ZLC carbon layers near the coreMedium-soft, dwell-heavy, linear feedback
handleAN / FL / STFlare / Straight / Anatomic (Italian wood)
plies5 wood + 2 ZLC carbon (inner ZLC construction)7-ply all wood
speedOFFOFF-
thickness_mm5.75.8-5.9 mm
weight_g8480-85 g (base); up to 94 g with CWT weights

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.

The Butterfly Innerforce ZLC brings the rare woody feel of inner-carbon construction, ideal if you loop aggressively from close to mid-distance and want carbon-level power without sacrificing dwell time. The Stiga Cybershape Wood delivers a predictable, very forgiving all-wood platform with exceptional spin support and adjustable balance via optional weights.

Choose the ZLC if you’re an advanced topspin player seeking rare feel and control at OFF speed. Pick the Cybershape if you’re intermediate to advanced, prioritize consistent spin and touch over raw pace, and value adjustable racket weight.

FAQ

Which blade suits heavy topspin looping?

Both excel here, but the ZLC rewards refined technique with a softer, more dwell-rich response. The Cybershape suits players who want spin with more margin for error.

What is the main speed difference?

The ZLC is rated OFF versus the Cybershape at OFF- (minus). The ZLC delivers noticeably more pace on impact, but both require active swing drive at mid-distance.

Which is more forgiving?

The Cybershape: its enlarged sweet spot and softer feedback make off-center hits more consistent. The ZLC demands better technique to unlock its potential.

How discontinued or available are they?

The ZLC is discontinued with premium resale prices. The Cybershape is current production and readily available at fair pricing.