Butterfly Hadraw SR vs Stiga Rosewood NCT V: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Hadraw SR | Stiga Rosewood NCT V | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.0/10 | 8.5/10 |
| feel | firm, crisp, high rebound with woody dwell | stiff hard feel with organic touch; NCT surface treatment |
| handle | FL / AN / ST | flared / anatomic / straight |
| plies | 7-ply all wood | 5-ply all wood (rosewood outer) |
| speed | OFF+ | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 6.6 | 6.2 |
| weight_g | 91 | approx 82-86 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Both are all-wood OFF-range blades with professional endorsements but very different playing styles. Hadraw SR is a premium Japanese blade with wenge dwell and lighter feel (91g). Rosewood NCT V is a classic Chinese-influenced stiff blade (82-86g) with hard, organic touch and exceptional short-game precision, endorsed by Xu Xin.
Hadraw SR is more communicative and forgiving; Rosewood NCT V is harder, more direct, and uncompromising. Hadraw SR rewards dwell-dependent techniques; Rosewood NCT V rewards flat drives, flicks, and aggressive close-table play. Hadraw SR is Japanese-made and currently available; Rosewood NCT V is discontinued and limited to secondary market. Both are offensive-minded; choose Hadraw SR for loop-based attackers seeking wood feedback, choose Rosewood NCT V for penhold players and flat-drive specialists seeking authentic Chinese style.
FAQ
Which is better for penhold grip?
Rosewood NCT V is designed for penhold play and Xu Xin’s style. Hadraw SR suits shakehand attackers.
Can shakehand players use Rosewood NCT V?
Yes, but they feel less feedback than penhold players. The blade is optimized for penhold.
Which is better for looping?
Hadraw SR, which has more dwell and forgiveness. Rosewood NCT V requires precise loose-wrist technique.
Which is faster?
Both are OFF-rated, but Rosewood NCT V plays faster due to its stiffness and excellent flat-drive characteristics.
Why is Rosewood NCT V discontinued?
Limited appeal outside Chinese penhold tradition and advancing age of design.