Butterfly Glayzer vs Yasaka Mark V: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Glayzer | Yasaka Mark V | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.2/10 | 8.0/10 |
| best_side | Forehand or Backhand (all-round offensive) | both |
| control | High | 9.5 |
| speed | 81 (manufacturer) | 8.4 |
| spin | 73 (manufacturer) | 8.5 |
| sponge_hardness | 38 degrees (JPN) | medium (around 43 degrees ESN) |
| type | Inverted / High Tension (Spring Sponge X) | inverted |
| weight_uncut_g | around 48g uncut | 47 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Mark V (8.0 rating) is a classic control choice with class-leading ball placement, low spin sensitivity, and exceptional consistency over a very long lifespan. It is beginner-to-advanced compatible and pocket-friendly compared with modern tensors. However, it was designed for celluloid balls and performs noticeably worse with modern plastic balls. Speed and spin are below modern tensors, requiring a faster blade to finish points.
Glayzer bridges the gap between Mark V’s control heritage and modern tensor performance. It delivers contemporary Dignics topsheet technology with spin reliability, keeps the forgiving arc philosophy, and is optimized for plastic balls. Glayzer suits intermediate offensive players who want consistency without the dated feel of older rubbers.
Choose Mark V if you prize control and longevity above all and have access to good blades to supply speed. Choose Glayzer if you want modern tensor spin paired with reliable control.
FAQ
Which is better for plastic balls?
Glayzer is optimized for modern plastic balls. Mark V was designed for celluloid and underperforms with plastic.
Which lasts longer?
Mark V has exceptional lifespan and consistency. Glayzer is above-average but shorter.
Which has better control?
Mark V offers class-leading ball placement. Glayzer is high control but less specialized.
Which is better for beginners?
Both suit beginners; Mark V is more old-school, Glayzer is modern-friendly.