Butterfly Glayzer vs Tibhar Evolution MX-S: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Glayzer | Tibhar Evolution MX-S | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.2/10 | 8.4/10 |
| best_side | Forehand or Backhand (all-round offensive) | Forehand |
| control | High | High |
| speed | 81 (manufacturer) | OFF |
| spin | 73 (manufacturer) | Very High (11.5 on Tibhar scale, highest in Evolution range) |
| sponge_hardness | 38 degrees (JPN) | around 47.3 degrees (hard) |
| type | Inverted / High Tension (Spring Sponge X) | Inverted tensor (ESN) |
| weight_uncut_g | around 48g uncut | 76 g (2.1-2.2 mm uncut sheet) |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Glayzer remains the accessible choice for intermediate players, while MX-S (8.4 rating) is a specialized high-spin forehand for advanced players who generate their own speed. MX-S hits the absolute highest spin output in Evolution (11.5 on Tibhar scale), with exceptional blocking and outstanding short game, plus very consistent batch-to-batch quality.
Yet MX-S weighs 76g uncut—the heaviest in the range—and is unforgiving: it demands strong technique and cannot compensate for passive or imprecise strokes. Its catapult is minimal compared to MX-P, requiring players to generate speed through pure technique rather than relying on rubber assistance. Durability declines after about six months of intensive play.
Choose Glayzer for broad skill-level fit, light weight, and durability. Choose MX-S only if you are an advanced player who bases your game on high-spin looping and precise serve placement and does not need catapult assistance.
FAQ
Which has more spin?
MX-S delivers the highest spin in the Evolution range (11.5). Glayzer is very consistent but less specialized.
Which is heavier?
MX-S is the heaviest at 76g uncut. Glayzer is light at 48g.
Which is more forgiving?
Glayzer’s high control is forgiving. MX-S demands strong technique and punishes errors.
Which is easier to generate speed with?
Glayzer has moderate catapult support. MX-S requires you to generate speed through technique.