Butterfly Glayzer vs Stiga Mantra M: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Glayzer | Stiga Mantra M | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.2/10 | 8.2/10 |
| best_side | Forehand or Backhand (all-round offensive) | Backhand or Forehand |
| control | High | High |
| speed | 81 (manufacturer) | High |
| spin | 73 (manufacturer) | High |
| sponge_hardness | 38 degrees (JPN) | Medium (approx 45 degrees) |
| type | Inverted / High Tension (Spring Sponge X) | Inverted / Pimples-in |
| weight_uncut_g | around 48g uncut | approx 64 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Both hit 8.2 rating and offer high control, making them solid intermediate choices. Glayzer combines premium topsheet technology with a forgiving softer sponge and high arc that reduces net errors and suits players building consistency. Its wide gear range handles touch play through full-swing loops, though it trades explosive power for reliability.
Mantra M delivers excellent topspin loop performance with a grippy top sheet that handles backspin lifts well, along with stable blocking. Its medium hardness sits between Glayzer’s softness and harder tensors, giving good control while offering more speed and spin than Glayzer. However, the topsheet wears relatively quickly under regular play, and power drops significantly the further you move from the table.
Pick Glayzer for durability and broad forgiveness. Pick Mantra M if you prioritize loop and serve spin and play mostly at close range.
FAQ
Which is better for topspin loops?
Mantra M excels at loops with excellent spin generation. Glayzer is consistent but less explosive.
Which lasts longer?
Glayzer’s topsheet holds grip longer. Mantra M’s topsheet wears relatively quickly.
Which is more forgiving?
Glayzer has a higher arc and wider margin for error. Mantra M is harder and more demanding.
Which is better for mid-distance play?
Glayzer performs well at all distances. Mantra M loses power further from the table.