Butterfly Glayzer vs Nittaku Fastarc C-1: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Glayzer | Nittaku Fastarc C-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.2/10 | 8.4/10 |
| best_side | Forehand or Backhand (all-round offensive) | backhand or allround |
| control | High | high |
| speed | 81 (manufacturer) | 15.25 (Nittaku scale) |
| spin | 73 (manufacturer) | 12.25 (Nittaku scale) |
| sponge_hardness | 38 degrees (JPN) | 45 degrees |
| type | Inverted / High Tension (Spring Sponge X) | inverted / tensor |
| weight_uncut_g | around 48g uncut | approx 47 g (157 x 150 mm sheet) |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Nittaku Fastarc C-1, rated 8.4, excels at outstanding spin and dwell time on opening loops with a forgiving high arc providing excellent safety margin. Its G-1 topsheet is very grippy and spinny when active, delivering effortless passive blocks and close-to-table consistency with excellent mid-distance striking and controlled power. Strong value versus Tenergy 64 or 80 at lower price, plus durable topsheet that holds grip well over time. However, top-end speed is lower than Fastarc G-1 or Tenergy 05, generates little free-spin passively (needing active strokes), service spin is slightly less sharp than harder competitors, and advanced players may outgrow it quickly. Glayzer at 8.2 offers Dignics topsheet with forgiving 38-degree sponge, wide all-round versatility across all strokes and both wings, and reliability at a similar price point. Both emphasize consistency and forgiveness, but C-1 specializes in passive block excellence and backhand use while Glayzer balances all playing styles. For intermediate to advanced loopers who prioritize arc, consistency and backhand performance, C-1 is excellent; Glayzer suits all-rounders seeking broader offensive range.
FAQ
Which is better for backhand?
C-1 is excellent for backhand use. Glayzer works well on backhand but C-1 is more specialized.
Which spins more on passive strokes?
Both generate modest free spin; both need active strokes. C-1 is slightly less passive-friendly, requiring more activation.
Which has a higher top-end speed?
Glayzer at 81 manufacturer is faster. C-1 top-end is lower and not built for speed-first attackers.
Which is better for mid-distance striking?
Both excel. C-1 edges slightly with its dwell-time advantage; Glayzer balances consistency across distances.
Which is more durable?
Both are durable. C-1 topsheet hold grip well; Glayzer is above average. Both outperform budget alternatives.