Butterfly Glayzer 09C vs Nittaku Fastarc C-1: Which Should You Buy?

UltraSpin comparison · 2026-06-15 · rubber

Butterfly Glayzer 09CNittaku Fastarc C-1
Our rating8.3/108.4/10
best_sideBothbackhand or allround
control95 arc rating (high)high
speed75 (medium)15.25 (Nittaku scale)
spin87 (high)12.25 (Nittaku scale)
sponge_hardness42 degrees JPN (approximately 47-50 degrees ESN)45 degrees
typeinvertedinverted / tensor
weight_uncut_g68-69g uncut, approximately 47-49g when cutapprox 47 g (157 x 150 mm sheet)

We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.

Nittaku Fastarc C-1 rates 8.4, outpacing Butterfly Glayzer 09C at 8.3. Nittaku Fastarc C-1 delivers higher speed and offensive power, while Butterfly Glayzer 09C offers more control and forgiveness.

Butterfly Glayzer 09C shines with outstanding block and counter-driving capability. Nittaku Fastarc C-1 excels at delivering speed and spin to top players.

Beginners favor Butterfly Glayzer 09C for its forgiving nature. Advanced players prefer Nittaku Fastarc C-1 for its aggressive output.

FAQ

Which is faster?

Nittaku Fastarc C-1 is faster at 15.25 (Nittaku scale) vs Butterfly Glayzer 09Cs 75 (medium). Speed-focused attackers prefer Nittaku Fastarc C-1. Control-first players favor Butterfly Glayzer 09C.

Which suits beginners better?

Butterfly Glayzer 09C forgives more errors and rewards learning. Nittaku Fastarc C-1 demands better technique. Start with Butterfly Glayzer 09C if developing fundamentals.

Which generates more spin?

Nittaku Fastarc C-1 has higher spin output compared to Butterfly Glayzer 09C. Topspin loopers and aggressive players favor Nittaku Fastarc C-1.

Which works better on backhand?

Butterfly Glayzer 09C suits both. Nittaku Fastarc C-1 excels on backhand or allround. Match placement to your attacking wing.

Which offers better value?

Butterfly Glayzer 09C typically costs less and lasts longer. Nittaku Fastarc C-1 commands premium pricing but delivers higher performance. Consider total cost.