Andro Treiber CI OFF vs Butterfly Innerforce Layer ZLC: Which Should You Buy?
| Andro Treiber CI OFF | Butterfly Innerforce Layer ZLC | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.4/10 | 8.7/10 |
| feel | woody with carbon kick; firm primary touch, softer follow-through | Soft ZLC feel, woody touch, excellent dwell time |
| handle | FL / AN / ST | FL / ST / AN / CS |
| plies | 5 plies (3 wood + 2 inner KVL carbon layers) | 7-ply, 5 wood + 2 ZL carbon (inner) |
| speed | OFF | OFF+ |
| thickness_mm | approx 5.9mm | 5.7 |
| weight_g | approx 84-90g | 85-94 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
The Andro Treiber CI OFF (8.4) and Butterfly Innerforce Layer ZLC (8.7) occupy different niches despite similar weights (84-90g vs 85-94g). Treiber CI combines a Limba top layer with inner KVL carbon layers to deliver unique kick-type elasticity: firm touch on primary contact, softer follow-through. It generates outstanding spin and dwell with lower vibration than outer-carbon alternatives. ZLC, a 7-ply design with inner ZL carbon, delivers exceptional control for an OFF+ speed blade with soft, woody feel and genuine ZLC power on demand.
The speed gap is the defining factor. Treiber CI at OFF is moderate speed not suited for players needing OFF+ pace; ZLC at OFF+ is the faster option but with a smaller sweet spot. ZLC’s low throw angle suits close-to-mid-distance aggressive play and rewards precise placement, clashing with Chinese tacky rubber setups. Treiber CI works with more varied rubber types and is more forgiving on off-center contact for its speed class. ZLC commands a premium price (200-220 USD) and requires advanced technique; Treiber CI is more accessible. For two-winged loopers at intermediate-advanced level who want a woody carbon feel with distinctive kick and adaptability, Treiber CI is the smarter choice. For advanced players seeking high-control, high-spin OFF+ offensive blade, ZLC is the specialist pick.
FAQ
Which is faster?
ZLC at OFF+ is faster than Treiber CI at OFF. ZLC better for players needing higher offensive speed.
Which is more forgiving?
Treiber CI is more forgiving on off-center contact and works with a wider range of rubber pairings.
Which has better spin?
Both excel at spin generation. ZLC has outstanding dwell; Treiber CI has unique kick-type elasticity. Roughly equivalent for spin-focused players.
Which works better with Chinese tacky rubbers?
Treiber CI is more versatile. ZLC’s low throw angle clashes with Chinese tacky rubber setups.