Friendship 729 Battle II vs Tibhar Aurus Prime: Which Should You Buy?
| Friendship 729 Battle II | Tibhar Aurus Prime | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| best_side | FH | forehand |
| control | 8 | 7.5/10 |
| speed | 8 | 9.0/10 |
| spin | 9 | 9.5/10 |
| sponge_hardness | hard | 50 degrees |
| type | tacky | tensor |
| weight_uncut_g | 68 | 70 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Battle II teaches topspin through high spin and dwell, best for forehand-dominant learners. Tibhar Aurus Prime is a medium-hard tensor delivering heavy, arcing, powerful topspin—nearly competitive with Tenergy 05 but cheaper and with softer feel despite 50-degree sponge. Both suit forehand attackers. Aurus Prime is steeper learning curve (not recommended for beginners) but offers superior flat hitting, low spin sensitivity (safer blocking), and exceptional durability.
Battle II is for improving attackers seeking high spin and consistency. Aurus Prime is for advanced topspin-dominant players wanting Tenergy-class performance at lower cost.
FAQ
Which has softer feel?
Aurus Prime feels softer than its 50-degree rating suggests due to thinner topsheet. Battle II is hard and stiff but familiar to Chinese rubber users.
Topspin quality?
Aurus Prime: heavy, arcing, powerful. Battle II: high and consistent, builds loops effectively.
Blocking performance?
Aurus Prime excellent and low spin-sensitive. Battle II solid but less stable on fast incoming loops.
Short game issues?
Aurus Prime: pushes can pop long due to catapult. Battle II: solid pushes and flicks.
Best blade pairing?
Aurus Prime: medium-pace blade (not carbon). Battle II: all-wood or moderate offensive blade.