Friendship 729 Battle II vs Andro Rasanter R47: Which Should You Buy?
| Friendship 729 Battle II | Andro Rasanter R47 | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.5/10 | 8.6/10 |
| best_side | FH | both |
| control | 8 | medium |
| speed | 8 | high |
| spin | 9 | high |
| sponge_hardness | hard | 47° |
| type | tacky | tensor inverted |
| weight_uncut_g | 68 | 69 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Both rubbers target attacking players, but they get there differently. The Battle II is a hard, tacky sheet with a low, diving arc and long dwell that produces elite serves and heavy brush-loop spin from a small wrist motion, with linear no-catapult control. The Rasanter R47 is a harder 47-degree tensor with a thin 1.7 mm topsheet over a thick digging sponge, delivering flagship-level spin and killer speed that approach Tenergy 05 performance.
On style and speed, the R47 is the more explosive rubber, with high speed and high spin on either wing for a spin-and-pace looping game, while the Battle II offers spin through tackiness and is best close to the table on a forehand. Both demand an advanced, committed stroke; the R47 can be too much for many intermediates, and the Battle II likewise needs full strokes to perform.
Choose the R47 if you are an advanced looper chasing flagship pace and a lower-cost route to Tenergy-style power on both sides. Choose the Battle II, slightly behind in rating but far cheaper, if you want maximum tacky spin and serve quality on a budget and play a forehand-led close-table game. Note the R47 has mixed durability reports around 30 to 40 days, while the Battle II’s tackiness fades after about two months.
FAQ
Which rubber is faster?
The Rasanter R47 is the faster of the two, rated high speed with killer pace from its thin topsheet and digging sponge. The Battle II is surprisingly fast for a tacky rubber but is best close to the table.
Are these suitable for intermediate players?
Neither is ideal for intermediates still building control. The R47 can be too much for many intermediate players, and the Battle II demands strong technique and committed strokes.
Which has better durability?
Both have limits. The R47 has mixed reports, with some spin and control fading after roughly 30 to 40 days, while the Battle II’s tackiness and arc decline after about two months.
Which is better for serves?
The Battle II excels at serves and serve receive, producing huge spin from a small wrist motion thanks to its extreme tackiness. The R47 spins through grip rather than tack.