Tibhar Evolution MX-P vs Yasaka Rakza 7: Which Should You Buy?
| Tibhar Evolution MX-P | Yasaka Rakza 7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.7/10 | 8.6/10 |
| best_side | both | both |
| control | medium | high |
| speed | 13.5/14 | offensive |
| spin | 10.5/12 | high |
| sponge_hardness | 47.5° | 45–47° |
| type | tensor inverted | tensor inverted |
| weight_uncut_g | 70 | 70 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Fast Verdict
Tibhar Evolution MX-P is marketed as “the fastest Evolution rubber,” and it carries the highest rating in this pair at 8.7 against Rakza 7’s 8.4. But when you check the actual speed axis, Rakza 7 scores 8.9 against MX-P’s 8.4, meaning Rakza 7 is the numerically faster rubber of the two. That is worth sitting with for a moment: MX-P being the fastest rubber in its own product line does not make it the fastest rubber in this comparison. This is exactly the kind of gap that a review built on marketing language alone would miss, and it is why the axis data matters more than the pros list.
Where The Real Gaps Are
Two axes separate these rubbers in ways that matter for daily use. Durability differs by 2.0 points, the largest gap in this pair, and it favors Rakza 7 (8.0 versus 6.0). This lines up with the written reviews: Megaspin’s coverage of Rakza 7 cites roughly four months of playable life, while MX-P’s own cons note that spin fades after roughly four to six weeks of heavy use. If you play often, that difference in working life meaningfully changes your cost per month of use, not just your upfront price.
Throw differs by 1.5 points in the other direction, favoring MX-P (7.0 versus 5.5). MX-P’s pros describe a pronounced catapult and strong ball retention, consistent with a much higher throw and a longer dwell time, while Rakza 7’s cons specifically flag that its lower throw angle requires adjustment for players switching from faster rubbers. This is the throw gap doing exactly what you would expect: MX-P launches the ball on a higher, more forgiving arc, while Rakza 7 keeps things flatter and more direct.
Spin and control, by contrast, are close enough to ignore as decision factors: spin differs by 0.2 points (9.0 versus 9.2) and control differs by 0.2 points (8.7 versus 8.9). Whatever you decide between these two rubbers, it will not be because one spins meaningfully more than the other.
What The Reviews Say About Fit
MX-P’s own bestFor description is explicit that this is not a beginner rubber: it targets advanced offensive players who lead with both flat hits and loops and want a Tenergy 05-style alternative with a lower throw feel than Tenergy itself and better control and short game while keeping about 95 percent of Tenergy’s looping ability, according to its Revspin and Racket Insight coverage. Rakza 7’s bestFor is comparatively broader, intermediate offensive and all-round players building consistency and spin technique, and it carries ITTF approval plus a lower retail price around 48 to 50 dollars.
Should You Switch?
If you are currently on Rakza 7 and want a rubber with a more pronounced catapult and higher dwell for looping, MX-P is a real step up in that specific dimension, but you are trading away more than a third of your rubber’s working life and adding cost, and MX-P’s own cons warn that its hard Power sponge demands advanced technique and stroke adjustments. If you are on MX-P and tired of replacing rubber every month or so, moving to Rakza 7 buys you meaningfully more durability and ITTF approval for competition play, at the cost of some throw and dwell time you would need to compensate for with technique.
Bottom Line
Ignore the “fastest Evolution rubber” framing when comparing MX-P against Rakza 7 specifically; on this axis data, Rakza 7 is actually the faster of the two. The decision that matters is durability versus throw: pick Rakza 7 for a rubber that lasts roughly twice as long, or pick MX-P for a bigger catapult and higher dwell if you are prepared to replace it more often.
Frequently asked questions
Is Tibhar Evolution MX-P actually faster than Yasaka Rakza 7?
No, not in this comparison. MX-P is billed as the fastest rubber in Tibhar's own Evolution line, but its speed axis score (8.4) is lower than Rakza 7's (8.9) in aggregated ratings.
Which rubber lasts longer, MX-P or Rakza 7?
Rakza 7, by a clear margin. Its durability score is 2.0 points higher, and reviews cite roughly four months of playable life versus MX-P's four to six weeks before spin starts fading.
Is MX-P suitable for a beginner or intermediate player?
No. Its own bestFor description targets advanced offensive players and specifically warns that its hard sponge is not a beginner rubber. Rakza 7's bestFor description is aimed at intermediate players instead.