Stiga Cybershape Carbon vs Stiga Emerald VPS V: Which Should You Buy?
| Stiga Cybershape Carbon | Stiga Emerald VPS V | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.4/10 | 8.3/10 |
| feel | Medium-stiff with woody feedback; head-heavy balance; larger sweet spot placed further up the blade | Stiff, hard outer surface with medium throw angle and large sweet spot |
| handle | Flared (Classic) or Concave (Master) | Flared (FL), also available in ST and Chinese pen |
| plies | 5+2 carbon (CCF Close Core Fibre — carbon layer sits directly on wood core) | 5-ply all wood (Ebenholz/dark outer, VPS-treated middle veneers) |
| speed | OFF (Stiga speed rating 9.0 out of 10) | OFF+ |
| thickness_mm | approx 5 mm | 6.2 |
| weight_g | 85 plus or minus 5 g | 98 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
These represent fundamentally different carbon philosophies. The Cybershape Carbon features distinctive inner carbon construction with an exceptional sweet spot verified by lab testing, head-heavy balance that aids drive acceleration, and outstanding blocking comfort. It plays at speed rating 9.0 internally but registers as OFF competitively. The hexagonal shape aids serve angles but requires adaptation.
The Emerald VPS V delivers genuine OFF+ speed from pure all-wood construction with VPS treatment maximizing consistency and looping dwell. It generates more spin on loops than Cybershape but punishes weak technique severely. For counter-attackers wanting blocking comfort and a distinctive head-heavy feel, Cybershape Carbon wins; for maximum loop speed and all-wood feedback, Emerald VPS V excels.
FAQ
Which blade is better for backhand-dominant players?
The Cybershape Carbon’s head-heavy balance and larger sweet spot aid backhand drives. Emerald VPS V is more neutral but demands consistent forehand technique.
Are both suitable for heavy topspin loops?
Emerald VPS V has superior dwell time for topspin loops. Cybershape Carbon’s short dwell time challenges topspin specialists but excels at counter-looping.
Which is better at blocking?
The Cybershape Carbon is outstanding for blocking comfort on both forehand and backhand. Emerald blocks well but feels stiffer and less forgiving.
How do their weights compare?
Cybershape Carbon is approximately 85 plus or minus 5 grams; Emerald VPS V is 98g. Cybershape is substantially lighter.
Which blade is more expensive?
Cybershape Carbon costs around 220 EUR and is among the pricier options. Emerald VPS V is comparable to composite blade pricing.