Stiga Allround Evolution vs Yasaka Sweden Extra: Which Should You Buy?
| Stiga Allround Evolution | Yasaka Sweden Extra | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.2/10 | 8.7/10 |
| feel | soft, high feedback | soft-medium, high control |
| handle | FL/ST/AN | FL/ST |
| plies | 5W (all wood) | 5W (all wood) |
| speed | ALL+ | ALL+ |
| thickness_mm | 5.4 | 5.7 |
| weight_g | 80 | 85 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
The numbers
Yasaka Sweden Extra out-rates the Allround Evolution on Revspin’s aggregate score, 8.7 to 8.2, and the axis-by-axis breakdown explains why almost every meaningful gap tilts toward the Sweden Extra. Control: 9.1 vs 8.7, a real but modest 0.4-point edge. Consistency: 9.3 vs 8.8, a 0.5-point edge. Speed: 7.8 vs 7.3, another 0.5-point edge. None of these individually is dramatic, but they stack in the same direction, and that consistency of direction across three separate axes is more telling than any single number on its own.
The one axis with a genuinely large gap is weight: 6.4 for the Sweden Extra against 4.6 for the Allround Evolution, a 1.8-point spread - the biggest delta in this comparison by a wide margin. On the spec sheet that lines up with a real but far more modest 85g vs 80g stock weight, so treat the 1.8-point radar gap as amplified rather than literal; the blade will feel a bit more substantial in hand, not close to twice as heavy.
Stiffness runs the other way - Allround Evolution rates 4.4, Sweden Extra 3.6, a 0.8-point gap that means the Sweden Extra is the more flexible, dwell-heavy blade of the two, matching its reputation as a genuine touch blade for serves and close-to-mid looping. Hardness is close to a tie (5.0 vs 4.8) - a 0.2-point gap you can ignore entirely.
Where the sourcing agrees
Both blades draw ratings from the same three outlets - Revspin, Megaspin, and Reddit’s r/tabletennis - so this isn’t one blade with thin community data propping up a flattering score against a heavily reviewed rival. The Sweden Extra’s reputation, per those same sources, is built specifically on punching above its price: reviewers describe it as playing like a blade several times its cost, with control and feel as the headline strengths, not speed.
What they’re each for
The Allround Evolution is pitched at beginners taking “a small, safe step up in speed from the Stiga Allround Classic” - a training-wheels blade for players who are still learning strokes and want maximum feedback. The Sweden Extra is aimed one step further: “developing and intermediate all-round or control players on a budget who want elite feel and control close to the table and a blade they can grow into.” That “grow into” phrasing matters - it’s explicitly positioned as a blade you don’t have to replace as quickly as you improve.
Should you switch?
If you already own the Allround Evolution and are asking whether the Sweden Extra is worth the move: on this data, yes, more often than not. It beats the Allround Evolution on control, consistency, and speed simultaneously, without giving up meaningful ground anywhere except a bit more weight in hand and slightly reduced ball feedback for players who specifically love heavy vibration off the wood, which the Allround Evolution’s own review notes list as one of its pros. The trade-off is honest and narrow: you gain across three axes and pay in one, mostly cosmetic, sensation.
The one caveat worth flagging from the Sweden Extra’s own review data: “limited power from well behind the table - deep counter-loops and skylobs can fall short.” If your game already lives away from the table, that con matters more than any single axis delta above. Both blades are rated ALL+ on the speed scale, so neither one is going to turn you into a mid-distance counter-looper regardless of which you pick.
Bottom line
The Sweden Extra is the better blade on the numbers for a wider range of players, and the Allround Evolution’s remaining case rests mostly on marginally lighter feel and stronger wood vibration feedback for players who specifically want that sensation while they learn. For most developing players choosing between these two control-first blades, the axis data favors the Sweden Extra, and its own “budget” positioning suggests you don’t need to pay a premium to get there.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Yasaka Sweden Extra really better than the Stiga Allround Evolution?
On Revspin's aggregated data, yes - it rates higher on control (9.1 vs 8.7), consistency (9.3 vs 8.8) and speed (7.8 vs 7.3), with only a modest weight increase in exchange.
Is the Sweden Extra heavier than the Allround Evolution?
A little. It rates 6.4 vs 4.6 on the weight axis, though the actual stock specs are close: 85 grams vs 80 grams.
What is the Sweden Extra's biggest weakness compared to the Allround Evolution?
Its own review notes flag limited power from well behind the table, so deep counter-loops and skylobs can fall short if your game lives far off the table.
Are both blades good for beginners?
Yes, both are positioned for developing players, though the Allround Evolution is pitched more explicitly at true beginners while the Sweden Extra targets developing-to-intermediate players who want a blade to grow into.