Butterfly Timo Boll W7 vs Stiga Carbonado 290: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Timo Boll W7 | Stiga Carbonado 290 | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 7.8/10 | 8.3/10 |
| feel | Hard, stiff, direct | very stiff, hard, crisp and direct carbon feel with a high-pitched sound; fast and linear with a low throw |
| handle | FL, ST | FL |
| plies | 7-ply all wood (Limba / Ayous / Kiri) | 5 wood + 2 carbon (7-ply), TeXtreme carbon |
| speed | OFF | OFF+ |
| thickness_mm | 6.7 | 6.2 |
| type | — | OFF+ |
| weight_g | 94 | 95 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
The Timo Boll W7 captures near-carbon OFF speed in pure all-wood form with a huge sweet spot and satisfying Limba feel, suited to flat-drive dominant play. The Stiga Carbonado 290 is a true OFF+ speedster with doubled 200-gram TeXtreme carbon delivering extreme power and a crisp carbon feel, comparable to Jun Mizutani ZLC class blades.
The Carbonado 290 is the uncompromising choice for advanced, aggressive attackers already comfortable with stiff, very fast blades. The Timo Boll W7 is softer and more forgiving, though still stiff by all-wood standards. Both demand expert technique.
FAQ
Is Carbonado 290 really OFF+?
Yes, genuinely rated on par with Jun Mizutani ZLC. Speed is extreme and consistent.
Why is the throw so low on the 290?
Low throw delivers crisp, fast trajectories but requires adapting your bat angle. Net chance is real until you adjust.
Which blade is easier to control?
Timo Boll W7 is noticeably softer and more forgiving. Carbonado 290 is unforgiving and demands perfect technique.
Can either blade chop?
No. Carbonado 290 is explicitly unsuitable for chopping with long pimples. Timo Boll W7 is also offensive-only.
What is the price difference?
Carbonado 290 is premium-priced at market’s high end. Timo Boll W7 is expensive due to scarcity but generally lower than flagship composites.