Butterfly Timo Boll Allround vs Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Timo Boll Allround | Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.3/10 | 8.2/10 |
| feel | Medium-soft, classic all-wood dwell with good tactile feedback | Medium |
| handle | FL/ST/AN/XXS | FL|ST |
| plies | 5-ply all wood (koto outer) | 5 wood + 2 carbon (inner FE carbon) |
| speed | ALL+ | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 5.5 | 5.5 |
| weight_g | ~85 | 90 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
Butterfly Timo Boll Allround (8.3 rating) and Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner (8.2 rating) represent different eras in blade design philosophy. Timo Boll Allround is a discontinued all-wood blade offering outstanding control and placement precision at close to mid-table with satisfying tactile feedback supporting technique development. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner is a hybrid featuring inner FE carbon that adds power on drives without stiffening the feel, retaining a natural, woody ball sensation unique in carbon blade category.
Timo Boll Allround’s speed ceiling is too low for players ready to move into offensive play, limiting advancement potential. Acoustic Carbon Inner’s inner placement adds power without losing wooden feel, addressing this advancement gap. Timo’s Koto outer veneer adds crispness without safety sacrifice; Acoustic maintains natural ball sensation while adding carbon stability. Timo’s lightweight build reduces fatigue during practice; Acoustic’s 90-gram weight is standard.
Timo Boll Allround is now discontinued, requiring secondary market sourcing and pricing premium. Acoustic Carbon Inner at approximately USD 180 represents sustainable pricing for ongoing availability. Both support technique development before stepping to stiffer blades. Acoustic’s broader rubber compatibility and carbon-assisted power expression make it the practical choice. Timo appeals only to collectors or players specifically finding discontinued examples.
FAQ
Should I buy Timo Boll Allround if available?
Only if you specifically want classic all-wood play and accept secondary market pricing. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner serves the same development role better with power expression for advancement.
Which blade is better for players advancing to offensive play?
Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner’s inner carbon adds power on drives without stiffening feel, facilitating advancement to aggressive play. Timo’s speed ceiling requires blade change for offensive development.
How do the feels compare for technique focus?
Timo offers all-wood dwell for maximum tactile feedback supporting technique development. Acoustic retains natural woody sensation while adding carbon stability, balancing feedback with advancement capability.