Butterfly Timo Boll ALC vs Butterfly Zhang Jike ALC: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Timo Boll ALC | Butterfly Zhang Jike ALC | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 9.0/10 | 8.7/10 |
| feel | medium | medium-hard but flexible, crisp carbon with long dwell |
| handle | FL/ST/AN | FL/ST/AN |
| plies | 5W+2 Arylate-Carbon | 5W+2 Arylate-Carbon (5 wood plies with 2 Arylate-Carbon layers) |
| speed | OFF | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| weight_g | 86 | 88 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
A one-point hardness gap that explains everything else
Speed ties exactly at 9.0 between Timo Boll ALC and Zhang Jike ALC, which means every other difference in this comparison comes down to feel, not raw pace. The two axes that move the most both point toward Zhang Jike ALC playing softer: hardness differs by a full point (6.2 vs 5.2, the largest gap on this comparison) and control differs by 0.6 (8.7 vs 9.3) in Zhang Jike ALC’s favor. Its own pros list confirms the mechanism directly: a soft, flexible, non-stiff carbon feel paired with long dwell time that excels at looping and imparting spin, and strong control relative to other ALC and ZLC blades. Longer dwell time - how long the ball stays in contact with the rubber and blade during the stroke - is a real, mechanical reason a blade can feel more controllable without being slower; it gives you more time to steer the shot.
Consistency also favors Zhang Jike ALC, by 0.4 (9.7 vs 9.3), and stiffness favors Timo Boll ALC by 0.5 (5.8 vs 5.3) - a smaller, secondary version of the same pattern. Taken together, the picture is consistent across four separate axes: Zhang Jike ALC is the softer, more controllable, marginally more consistent blade of the two, while Timo Boll ALC is the stiffer, harder-hitting one with the more locked-in feel described in its own pros list (no hollow vibration, the whole face plays like one big sweet spot).
Weight and rubber pairing
Zhang Jike ALC is heavier uncut by 0.7 on the radar scale and 2 grams in absolute terms (88g vs 86g), which combined with its softer carbon can shift racket balance more than Timo Boll ALC does. Its pros list specifically notes that it pairs well with both tensor and tacky Chinese forehand rubbers - a genuinely useful piece of gear-matching information if you are building a setup around a rubber like DHS Hurricane rather than a European tensor, since not every ALC blade handles both rubber families equally well.
The purchasing fact that outranks the performance comparison
Here is the detail that matters more than any axis gap: Zhang Jike ALC’s own cons list states it has been heading toward discontinuation, affecting availability. That is not a performance knock, but for a buying decision it can be the deciding factor regardless of how the radar scores compare. If you cannot reliably source Zhang Jike ALC, or if you are worried about re-buying the same blade in a year, that risk needs to be weighed against its real advantages in control, consistency and dwell time. Timo Boll ALC, still an active production blade reviewed on TableTennisDaily and discussed regularly on Reddit’s r/tabletennis, carries none of that sourcing risk.
Should you switch
If you already own Timo Boll ALC and are drawn to Zhang Jike ALC for its control and dwell-time advantages, that is a defensible upgrade if your loop game is already advanced enough to use the extra dwell rather than just adding wasted contact time - its own bestFor summary is explicit that it targets intermediate-to-advanced loopers, not beginners. But given the availability risk, it is a harder recommendation to make today than it would have been when it was in full production. Going the other way, from Zhang Jike ALC to Timo Boll ALC, trades a smaller sweet spot (per Zhang Jike ALC’s own cons) and softer control for a stiffer, harder blade with guaranteed continued availability and the same top-end speed. Neither blade is a beginner’s first purchase; both explicitly reward an already-developed loop-driving stroke, and both come from Butterfly’s own ALC lineup rather than competing brands.
Frequently asked questions
Is Zhang Jike ALC still available to buy?
Its own cons list states it has been heading toward discontinuation, affecting availability - check current stock with a retailer before committing, especially if you want a specific handle shape.
Which blade has more control?
Zhang Jike ALC, by 0.6 on the radar (9.3 vs 8.7), attributed in its own pros list to a longer dwell time and a softer, more flexible carbon feel than Timo Boll ALC.
Which blade pairs better with tacky Chinese rubber?
Zhang Jike ALC. Its pros list specifically states it pairs well with both tensor and tacky Chinese forehand rubbers, a versatility not called out the same way for Timo Boll ALC.