Butterfly Primorac Carbon vs Tibhar Samsonov Alpha: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Primorac Carbon | Tibhar Samsonov Alpha | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.5/10 | 7.8/10 |
| feel | Medium-Hard | medium-stiff, good dwell time, controllable |
| handle | FL|ST|AN | FL/ST |
| plies | 5 wood + 2 carbon (TAMCA 5000 carbon, outer layer) | 5-ply all wood (Limba outer plies, Koto/Ayous middle layers) |
| speed | OFF | ALL |
| thickness_mm | 6.9 | 5.9 |
| weight_g | 88 | 85 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
The Butterfly Primorac Carbon and Tibhar Samsonov Alpha represent distinct philosophies in blade design. Butterfly Primorac Carbon achieves a higher rating of 8.5 with its carbon construction. Tibhar Samsonov Alpha rates 7.8 and emphasizes strong overall value.
Butterfly Primorac Carbon demands solid technique: players without developed footwork and looping skills will struggle. The blade excels at mid-distance attacking with exceptional blocking performance. Tibhar Samsonov Alpha is significantly more forgiving, making it suitable for a wider player range. Its larger sweet spot and consistent catapult help prevent misses on off-center hits.
Butterfly Primorac Carbon pairs well across a spectrum of rubbers, from tacky Chinese sheets to European tensors. Tibhar Samsonov Alpha shows versatile rubber compatibility with its natural, woody feel stepping in on soft touches. If you prioritize pure attacking speed and are comfortable with a demanding blade, choose Butterfly Primorac Carbon. If you want a controlled, more forgiving platform that grows with your skill, choose Tibhar Samsonov Alpha.
FAQ
Butterfly Primorac Carbon or Tibhar Samsonov Alpha - which is faster?
Butterfly Primorac Carbon is rated 8.5 with OFF-class speed and TAMCA 5000 carbon outer layers. Tibhar Samsonov Alpha rates 7.8. The Primorac delivers exceptional speed backed by stiff carbon construction, while the competing blade emphasizes control alongside pace.
Which blade suits beginners and intermediates?
Butterfly Primorac Carbon is very demanding and unsuitable for players without solid footwork or looping technique. Tibhar Samsonov Alpha is far more forgiving with its large sweet spot and consistent feel. If you are developing your technique, Tibhar Samsonov Alpha is the better choice.
How do the blade feels compare?
Butterfly Primorac Carbon has a Medium-Hard feel with direct vibration feedback. Tibhar Samsonov Alpha delivers a medium-stiff, good dwell time, controllable feel that is more forgiving on off-center contact. Choose Butterfly Primorac Carbon for a responsive, feedback-rich experience or Tibhar Samsonov Alpha for a softer, more predictable platform.
What rubbers pair best with these blades?
Butterfly Primorac Carbon works excellently with both tacky Chinese rubbers and European tensor rubbers. Tibhar Samsonov Alpha shows strong compatibility across different rubber types including tacky and non-tacky options. Both blades reward quality rubber selection - match your rubber hardness to your attacking style.
Which blade offers better long-term value?
Butterfly Primorac Carbon is praised for exceptional durability, with players reporting 8 or more years of reliable use. Tibhar Samsonov Alpha also represents a solid long-term investment for committed players. Either blade will last years with proper care and prove its worth through consistent performance.