Butterfly Primorac Carbon vs Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner: Which Should You Buy?
| Butterfly Primorac Carbon | Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner | |
|---|---|---|
| Our rating | 8.5/10 | 8.2/10 |
| feel | Medium-Hard | Medium |
| handle | FL|ST|AN | FL|ST |
| plies | 5 wood + 2 carbon (TAMCA 5000 carbon, outer layer) | 5 wood + 2 carbon (inner FE carbon) |
| speed | OFF | OFF |
| thickness_mm | 6.9 | 5.5 |
| weight_g | 88 | 90 |
We may earn a commission from links on this page. Learn more.
The Butterfly Primorac Carbon and Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner represent distinct philosophies in blade design. Butterfly Primorac Carbon achieves a higher rating of 8.5 with its carbon construction. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner rates 8.2 and emphasizes strong overall value.
Butterfly Primorac Carbon demands solid technique: players without developed footwork and looping skills will struggle. The blade excels at mid-distance attacking with exceptional blocking performance. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner is significantly more forgiving, making it suitable for a wider player range. Its larger sweet spot and consistent catapult help prevent misses on off-center hits.
Butterfly Primorac Carbon pairs well across a spectrum of rubbers, from tacky Chinese sheets to European tensors. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner shows versatile rubber compatibility with its natural, woody feel stepping in on soft touches. If you prioritize pure attacking speed and are comfortable with a demanding blade, choose Butterfly Primorac Carbon. If you want a controlled, more forgiving platform that grows with your skill, choose Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner.
FAQ
Butterfly Primorac Carbon or Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner - which is faster?
Butterfly Primorac Carbon is rated 8.5 with OFF-class speed and TAMCA 5000 carbon outer layers. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner rates 8.2. The Primorac delivers exceptional speed backed by stiff carbon construction, while the competing blade emphasizes control alongside pace.
Which blade suits beginners and intermediates?
Butterfly Primorac Carbon is very demanding and unsuitable for players without solid footwork or looping technique. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner is far more forgiving with its large sweet spot and consistent feel. If you are developing your technique, Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner is the better choice.
How do the blade feels compare?
Butterfly Primorac Carbon has a Medium-Hard feel with direct vibration feedback. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner delivers a Medium feel that is more forgiving on off-center contact. Choose Butterfly Primorac Carbon for a responsive, feedback-rich experience or Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner for a softer, more predictable platform.
What rubbers pair best with these blades?
Butterfly Primorac Carbon works excellently with both tacky Chinese rubbers and European tensor rubbers. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner shows strong compatibility across different rubber types including tacky and non-tacky options. Both blades reward quality rubber selection - match your rubber hardness to your attacking style.
Which blade offers better long-term value?
Butterfly Primorac Carbon is praised for exceptional durability, with players reporting 8 or more years of reliable use. Nittaku Acoustic Carbon Inner also represents a solid long-term investment for committed players. Either blade will last years with proper care and prove its worth through consistent performance.